facebook-pixel

Letter: The futility of gun background checks

(Scott Utterback | Courier Journal | AP) In this undated file photo, 17 crosses bearing the names and ages of those killed in last month's shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., were hung overnight from a Louisville billboard that advertises a local gun show. The vast majority of mass shooters have acquired their firearms legally with nothing in their background that would have prohibited them from possessing a gun. But there have been examples of lapses in the background check system that allowed guns to end up in the wrong hands. Very few states also have a mechanism to seize firearms from someone who is not legally allowed to possess one.

It’s great that public opinion seems to support universal background checks for gun ownership. It’s unfortunate that background checks are futile in controlling gun violence.

The flawed assumption is that background checks can determine who will be a "good guy" in the future. Clearly they cannot.

About 80 percent of weapons used in mass shootings were purchased legally, according to many different sources. In other words, we are not good enough at judging whether current law-abiders will remain so.

We all know cases in which perfectly nice folks went over edge due to nasty break-ups, job loss, drug addiction, isolation, radicalization, personality flaws, whatever.

This happens all over the world, but only in America does it result in a singular and severe gun violence epidemic. And the single, stunningly obvious difference is the massive number of guns in circulation, most purchased with useless background checks.

Tom Horton, Park City

Submit a letter to the editor