facebook-pixel

Instacart adjusts worker pay after uproar over tipping policy

(Jeff Chiu | AP file photo) In this Jan. 4, 2013, file photo, Lyft driver Nancy Tcheou uses her phone to accept a ride from a passenger in San Francisco. The rise of on-demand apps and services are bringing up questions on what to tip drivers, Instacart grocery delivery people and others.

Instacart is changing a controversial policy on how it pays workers who pick and deliver grocery orders, after protests over a pay system instituted last fall.

The San Francisco-based startup said it would give workers the full tips from customers and stop docking parts of the tips from fees Instacart pays them. It will also offer back pay.

The retreat illustrates a delicate balance gig-economy startups struggle to maintain between keeping prices low for customers and paying their workers fairly. Fees associated with food delivery orders are often opaque for both customers and workers. Small changes to policies can have outsize effects on how much workers take home.

Instacart made a change in November to its compensation system, in which the company sometimes pays workers less if they receive a certain amount in tips. In January, workers organized a campaign against the new pay system. They said that under the new policy, some of the tips that customers gave through the Instacart app wouldn't go directly to the worker but would instead be used to offset a $10 minimum payment per job guaranteed by Instacart. The issue was further highlighted by the story of an Instacart worker who was paid 80 cents for a particular delivery.

In a blog post on Wednesday, Instacart Chief Executive Officer Apoorva Mehta wrote that the company will now always separate tips from the compensation from the company. It also raised the guaranteed pay for some jobs and said it would retroactively pay its workers for the amounts that tips were used to offset the job pay.

“These changes were designed to increase transparency while also keeping pace with a rapidly-evolving industry,” Mehta wrote. “In doing so, we’ve tried, in good faith, to balance those needs, but clearly we haven’t always gotten it right.”