Commentary: Gilroy, El Paso, Dayton, and the normalization of violence

As a bad Catholic, I need to make a confession. I no longer pay attention to mass shootings.

If I see a headline in the newspaper or online, I skip over to another story. If it comes up on my NPR podcast, I touch the arrow that advances me to the next story. If it is on CNN, I switch to the Hallmark Channel.

I feel guilty, but I simply cannot take it anymore. I am sick of the violence and our country’s inability to do anything about it. I see no point in listening to the same story over and over again.

News stories about mass shootings follow the same 10-point template: 1) initial confusion about what happened; 2) on-site interviews with those who escaped the scene; 3) talking heads speculate about the motive of the gunman; 4) a news conference by police chief and mayor; 5) calls for greater gun control from Democrats; 6) calls for thoughts and prayers from Republicans; 7) a Trump tweet; 8) more speculation on motive of gunman; 9) coverage of funerals; 10) interviews with victims’ families.

Nothing changes, except people buy more guns.

We move on to other news until the next shooting. It doesn’t matter where the shooting takes place — gay bar, church, primary school, university, shopping center, baseball game or on the street. Nothing shocks us enough to make us demand change.

And yet, mass shootings are only a minor contributor to the deaths from gun violence. Gun violence is common in most inner cities, but it gets little coverage in newspapers read by the white community. And gun suicides, spousal shootings and accidents are so common that even white victims are ignored unless a child is involved.

I am afraid that others may soon respond to mass shootings that same way I do, the same way we do to other gun violence — ignore it and move on. No matter how horrible something is, if it is repeated time and time again, we get accustomed to it.

We can’t let this happen. Religious leaders cry out, but few listen.

From Rome, Pope Francis took notice of the shootings in El Paso and Dayton on Aug. 3 and 4. These followed closely after the killings at the garlic festival in Gilroy, Calif.

Texas Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, called the shooting “terrible, senseless and inhumane.”

Franciscan Bishop John Stowe of Lexington, KY, tweeted: “More senseless gun killings… more white nationalism… more disregard for the sanctity of human life… We need to create the beloved community Jesus envisions now.”

Many Catholic leaders have called for government action to curb gun violence. In their 2000 pastoral statement on criminal justice, the bishops wrote, “We support measures that control the sale and use of firearms and make them safer (especially efforts that prevent their unsupervised use by children or anyone other than the owner), and we reiterate our call for sensible regulation of handguns.”

For many years, the USCCB has supported what it calls “reasonable measures” to address the problem of gun violence. These include:

• A total ban on assault weapons, which the USCCB supported when the ban passed in 1994 and when Congress failed to renew it in 2004.

• Measures that control the sale and use of firearms, such as universal background checks for all gun purchases.

• Limits on civilian access to high-capacity weapons and ammunition magazines.

• A federal law to criminalize gun trafficking.

• Improved access to and increased resources for mental health care and earlier interventions.

• Regulations and limitations on the purchasing of handguns.

• Measures that make guns safer, such as locks that prevent children and anyone other than the owner from using the gun without permission and supervision.

• An honest assessment of the toll of violent images and experiences which inundate people, particularly our youths.

The bishops also support a “more appropriate minimum age” for gun ownership and a ban on “bump stocks.”

None of these recommendations has gone anywhere. We still do not have sensible regulations of handguns, let alone a ban on assault weapons.

The country needs to do something before mass shootings become so common that people follow my bad example and start ignoring them. More than 60 percent of the public wants stricter gun control. True, gun control is controversial, but the Pew Research Center found bipartisan support for some proposals

“Around nine-in-10 Republicans and Democrats (both 89%) say people with mental illnesses should be prevented from buying guns,” according to a 2018 report from Pew. “Nearly as many in both parties (86% of Democrats and 83% of Republicans) say people on federal no-fly or watch lists should be barred from purchasing firearms. And majorities of both Democrats (91%) and Republicans (79%) favor background checks for private gun sales and sales at gun shows.’

But Congress cannot even enact such minor controls. Enough is enough. We must demand that our government do something about mass shootings and other forms of gun violence.

Editor’s note • The views expressed in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.