facebook-pixel

Letter: Pipeline project suffers from gross mismanagement

Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune Taxpayers can expect to foot up to 72 percent of the controversial Lake Powell Pipeline's costs, according to University of Utah economists who analyzed repayment models developed in support of the billion-dollar-plus proposal to pipe Colorado River water from Glen Canyon Dam, above, 140 miles to St. George. Officials from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) began a two-day site visit in southern Utah Tuesday, examining the 139-mile route of the proposed Lake Powell Pipeline, September 20, 2016. The public tour was so that FERC could view the pipeline's planned hydropower stations, proposed alignment and the environment the pipeline will cross.

In 2005, I attended a meeting at Dixie State College in St. George at which Ron Thompson, general manager of the Washington County Water Conservancy District, said there was enough water to support a population of 260,000 people. He said the Lake Powell pipeline would cost $560,000 and could support an additional 500,000 people for a total population of 760,000.

News reports show how wrong he was and how poorly managed this project has been. For the state to spend $33 million over the past 10 years for an incomplete report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shows gross mismanagement. We also learned that FERC accepted the incomplete report, the details of which are less disclosed to the public rather than letting the BLM take it over.

The biggest failure of the state’s report was in failing to accurately estimate the cost and who will pay for the pipeline. The state’s cost estimate of $1.4 billion is modest and more likely $3 billion or more. Most likely going up will be the cost of water plus city taxes to pay for infrastructure for the increase in population. It’s time at the state and water district for new management who are held accountable.

Bob Routsong, St. George