facebook-pixel

Letter: Miller case opened the floodgates to guns

A little-known device called a "bump stock" is attached to a semi-automatic rifle at the Gun Vault store and shooting range Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2017, in South Jordan, Utah. Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock bought 33 guns within the last year, but that didn't raise any red flags. Neither did the mountains of ammunition he was stockpiling, or the bump stocks found in his hotel room that allow semi-automatic rifles to mimic fully automatic weapons. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)

Although I have not read Judge Ted Stewart’s book “Supreme Power: 7 Pivotal Supreme Court Decisions That Had a Major Impact on America,” a listing of those decisions indicates that he missed one that may be considered more pivotal than all the others.

That was the 1939 U.S. vs. Miller decision where the court essentially reversed earlier rulings regarding the Second Amendment. That case made clear that the militia consisted of “all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense” and that “when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.”

In setting forth this definition of the militia, the court implicitly rejected the view that the Second Amendment guarantees a right only to those individuals who are members of the militia. And that opened the floodgates so that today there are more guns than adults in the U.S. and we have the highest homicide by guns rate than any other nation.

Kermit Heid

Salt Lake City