Michael S. Robinson: Go for it, Jon. Run a write-in campaign

My heart sank when Jon Huntsman’s run to be Utah’s Republican gubernatorial candidate failed to get the votes he needed.

Just like me, thousands of Utahns actually declared themselves Republicans in order to vote for him in the primary election. Sadly, the inclusion of Thomas Wright and Greg Hughes on the ballot took a heavy toll; they took almost 30% of the votes. It was the kind of vote dilution that skews the results. Without that complication, Huntsman was the clear winner. What a shame.

Viewing the outcome, it would have made sense to have a runoff, allowing the Hughes and Wright votes to be reallocated. Yet, as a reminder of his impeccable manners, Huntsman graciously conceded to his defeat, noting that the voice of the people had been heard.

“Today the race was called, and we accept the will of the people, as is our tradition as Americans,” Huntsman said. “The visions put forward for Utah were very different, and regret that I will not be leading the efforts in moving us towards a new horizon.”

Polite as it was, it was also a subtle poke at what Huntsman considers weak state leadership.

My immediate thought, like many other Utahns was that we could just write Huntsman in, and his broad popularity would make him governor. I was really sad when he announced that he would not seek a write-in campaign.

Looking back at his first two terms, there was a reason why Utah, under Huntsman’s leadership, was named the best-managed state. Utahns loved him; his popularity was validated by receiving almost 80% of the votes in the 2008 election.

Huntsman still has broad support, and he towers above nominee Spencer Cox on all fronts. Cox, as lieutenant governor, has been, essentially, Gov. Gary Herbert’s aide-de-camp -- a gopher, personal assistant and boy-Friday. Like the man he’s served, he’s a nice guy who falls short of being a leader, both in experience and personality.

If Cox becomes our next governor, Utahns will have more of the same -- a spineless, milk-toast figurehead who’s most interested in keeping the status quo and avoiding making waves. On the other hand, Huntsman has led our state before, and he’s served in every administration since Ronald Reagan..

So what are we left with? While Herbert may have been a satisfactory lieutenant governor to Huntsman, he was never made of the same mettle. All he has to show for his two-plus terms in the capital is the lingering evidence that he tried to be popular at the expense of leadership. Namby-pamby is the word that comes to mind, letting others dictate his conscience in an effort to avoid making enemies. But that’s not what real leaders do.

In the past few days, the notion of a write-in Huntsman campaign has resurfaced. Might we get another chance to choose the right man for the job?

In recent years, Huntsman stands out as the one governor who was progressive enough to help Utah emerge from the dark ages. While he did show respect for his heritage and for the local religious majority, he also had the guts to move our state forward. Under his leadership, Utah became a kinder place for outsiders, a more acceptable home for dozens of large companies and a more inclusive community for its diverse population.

Gov. Huntsman, please, pretty please, go for it. It’s your chance to make a real difference, and we need you.

Michael S. Robinson is a former Vietnam-era Army assistant public information officer. He resides in Riverton with his wife, Carol, and one mongrel dog.