facebook-pixel

Bankers scold SBA as coronavirus relief loan system crashes in flood of applications

(Doug Mills | The New York Times) President Donald Trump and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin at the daily coronavirus news briefing at the White House on April 21, 2020. The Paycheck Protection Program is a centerpiece of the government’s $2 trillion economic relief package.

Minutes after a $310 billion aid program for small companies opened for business Monday, the online portal for submitting applications crashed. And it kept crashing all day, much to the frustration of bankers around the country who were trying — and failing — to apply on behalf of desperate clients.

Some bankers were so irritated that they vented on social media at the Small Business Administration, which is running the program. Rob Nichols, chief executive of the American Bankers Association, wrote on Twitter that the trade group’s members were “deeply frustrated” at their inability to access the system. Until the problems were fixed, he said, “#AmericasBanks will not be able to help more struggling small businesses.”

Pent-up demand for the funds has been intense, after the program’s initial $342 billion funding ran out in under two weeks, stranding hundreds of thousands of applicants whose loans did not get processed. Last week, Congress approved the additional $310 billion for small businesses hit by the coronavirus pandemic. Bankers were expecting the money to once again run out quickly, and so Monday at 10:30 a.m. Eastern time, when round two opened, they were ready to go.

But for the second time in a month, the relief effort, called the Paycheck Protection Program, turned into chaos, sowing confusion among lenders and borrowers. A centerpiece of the government’s $2 trillion economic stimulus package, the program offers small companies — typically those with up to 500 workers — forgivable loans of up to $10 million. The SBA is backing the loans, but customers must apply through financial institutions.

[Read more: Utah’s unemployment claims continue to surge as self-employed and gig workers are added]

When the aid program first went live on April 3, the Treasury Department’s goal was to quickly steer money to the neediest businesses — hair salons, coffee shops, dry cleaners and others. But many large banks needed more time to set up their systems and held off for days on taking applications, leading to an outcry from borrowers who could not afford to keep waiting. Many were also furious that hundreds of publicly traded companies, as well as wealthy clients of some big banks, got access to those funds.

Employees at TAB Bank in Ogden, Utah, spent last week pulling all-nighters to finish preparing loan applications from 1,100 customers. When the SBA began accepting applications Monday morning, they started trying to submit their files. But the SBA’s computer system stalled, froze and crashed repeatedly. Five hours later, the bank had gotten only seven loans processed.

“I’m beyond frustrated,” said Curt Queyrouze, the bank’s president, who also shared his experience on Twitter. “We wanted to update all of our customers this evening on the status of their applications, but right now, there’s not a lot of good news to give them.”

After the money ran out in 13 days, Congress approved the additional funding for small businesses last week. It set aside $60 billion of that amount for loans through community development lenders, credit unions and other smaller lenders. But lenders warned that the new money would also vanish fast — adding to the desperation of small businesses, which often have thin margins and scant savings, and dialing up the pressure on their bankers.

Monday morning, Richard Hunt, chief executive of the Consumer Bankers Association, a trade group for banks, told CNBC: “We think every dollar is accounted for already.”

The SBA tried to brace for the onslaught. It warned lenders Sunday that it would impose “pacing” limits and accept only 350 applications per hour from each lender — a move intended to reduce the technical strain on E-Tran, its electronic loan processing system, and make sure the available money was widely distributed. But bankers said they weren’t able to get anywhere near that volume through the system Monday.

Jill Castilla, chief executive of Citizens Bank of Edmond, a small community lender in Oklahoma, had 200 applications ready to submit Monday. After six hours of trying, she was able to get only three processed.

“We serve truly tiny businesses, and many of them are in desperate circumstances,” Castilla said. “We know that each hour that goes by means there’s more money used up that won’t be available to be allocated for loans in our community.”

On Twitter, Brad Bolton, president and chief executive of Community Spirit Bank, a lender in Red Bay, Ala., summarized his experience with two pictures and a caption. The first photo was of the SBA’s E-Tran portal, while the second showed an error message saying the site could not be reached; he captioned it “Hope and Despair in two pictures.” His tweet, directed at the SBA and Treasury, also said: “Your failure to be ready is unacceptable.”

[Read more: In a pandemic, more Americans are turning to Congress for help]

The SBA “had weeks to get this figured out, and here we are,” Bolton said in an interview. “It’s a disaster.”

In a message sent to lenders Monday afternoon, the SBA wrote that “unprecedented demand” was slowing the response time of E-Tran. The agency said it had twice as many people trying to access the system that day as it did during the first round of program lending. Despite the technical problems, the SBA said it had processed more than 100,000 loans under the program Monday from 4,000 lenders.

Those statistics alarmed Bolton, who was not able to get a single loan through the system for a six-hour stretch Monday.

“Who is getting their loans approved?” he said. “They’ve got to fix this, immediately, to give Main Street equitable access to this money.”

Just as happened the first time around — when bankers were given technical information by Treasury just hours before they were supposed to begin making loans — last-minute government guidance left banks scrambling. On Sunday, the SBA said that it would allow big lenders — those with at least 15,000 applications — to send in one bulk-submission file each. On Monday, after complaints from smaller banks, it reduced the threshold to 5,000 applications. (The loans would still be allocated in order, with approvals limited to 350 per hour, per bank, the agency said.)

The SBA and Treasury Department also said Sunday that individual lenders would be able to parcel out no more than 10% of the program’s total funds (excluding the money set aside for community lenders). That capped the big banks’ total lending at $60 billion each covering both rounds.

Applicants said that being stuck in limbo was maddening.

Janet Marinaccio, chief executive of Meet Each Need With Dignity, a nonprofit that runs a food bank and other relief services in the San Fernando Valley in California, applied for a loan weeks ago through Citi to help keep her organization’s 30 workers employed. It was not approved before the money ran out. Marinaccio was told Friday that Citi would submit her application first thing Monday. But by late afternoon, she was still waiting for word on whether it had made it through.

“We’re really hoping for a happy ending here,” she said.

Drew Benson, a Citi spokesman, said the bank started submitting applications to the SBA first thing Monday morning.

“Our objective is to secure funding for as many small business clients as possible and we are doing our absolute best to make it happen,” Benson said.

Bankers acknowledged that the SBA faced a huge challenge. Last year, it processed loans totaling around $30 billion — less than 5% of the volume it was asked to handle for the paycheck program. But the lack of adequate planning for Monday’s onslaught still angered them.

“This is one of the most inefficient days I’ve ever been a part of,” said Craig Street, chief lending officer at United Midwest Savings Bank in Columbus, Ohio. “We have people sitting in front of computers inputting data over and over again only to be continually timed out of the system and have to start over.”