For the "Deadpool" violation, Brewvies faces a fine up $25,000 and a 10-day suspension of its liquor license.
A DABC commission hearing is scheduled for later this month.
Brewvies, apparently, has had enough and issued an ultimatum Monday to the attorney general. It seeks the repayment of the fine for "The Hangover Part II," a notice of action for "Deadpool" be rescinded, and a promise that no such enforcement action will take place in the future.
The DABC may not be agreeable. In a July 1, 2015, letter to Brewvies, Sheila Page, an assistant attorney general representing DABC, stated that Brewvies must adhere to Utah law that disallows movies that are R-rated for sex or nudity where alcohol is served.
"The statutory prohibitions found in the Attire, Conduct and Entertainment Act governs conduct of DABC licensees and specifically addresses the showing of films, still pictures, electronic reproductions, or other visual reproductions depicting sex acts, simulated sex acts, genitals, etc," she stated.
On Feb. 26, three undercover agents from the Utah Bureau of Investigation went to Brewvies. They ordered beer and entered the theater, according to their report.
The results of the investigation by Officer Bradley Buck states: "The male and female characters are shown having sex while nude."
In another instance, according to the report, there is a brief scene of male full-frontal nudity.
The investigation narrative also includes the final credits where "a drawing of the main character (male) is shown as he rides on the back of a unicorn, he rubs its horn briefly until the horn shoots out rainbows (simulating orgasm)."
Nonetheless, that content is protected by the First Amendment, according to Salt Lake City attorney Rocky Anderson, the municipality's former mayor, who represents Brewvies. In a letter Monday to the attorney general and the DABC, Anderson said the state is apparently operating on "the misperception (and erroneous legal advice) that the DABC can constitutionally restrict the showing of films protected by the U.S. Constitution and the Utah Constitution."
Anderson pointed to the 1996 case of "44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island," in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that the 21st Amendment (which repealed Prohibition) cannot decrease in any manner First Amendment protections, whether or not alcohol is involved.