The deadline for the partner-benefits program passed last week. Sixteen of the 28 employees who requested packets completed the applications. They won't be processed until at least Jan. 5.

That's when Judge Stephen Roth will hear arguments from attorneys representing three citizens who sued the city, charging that Mayor Rocky Anderson's plan to extend benefits to domestic partners violates Utah's Defense of Marriage Act.

"If the judge says it's OK, we'll process the paperwork," said Jodi Langford, Salt Lake City employee-benefits administrator. "Otherwise, we'll just hold on to them until it is resolved one way or another."

According to the application forms, city employees had to agree to certain criteria to qualify. The main requirement is that the couple declare they have been together for at least six months and have a "long-term committed relationship and intend to remain together indefinitely."

Other requirements include documentation for joint mortgages or leases, joint ownership of a vehicle or power of attorney.

"We won't know how much it will cost the city - assuming the judge allows it - until a full year passes and all the claims have been processed," Langford added.

The Salt Lake City Council also is waiting for the ruling before proceeding with its plan to extend benefits on a household basis - allowing employees to include siblings or aging parents - as well as domestic partners.

"It won't preclude us from proceeding forward," said Councilwoman Jill Remington Love. "But it could help us prepare in case our benefits plan ends up in court."

lorib@sltrib.com