Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
This June 8, 2014, photo shows low water levels at the San Luis Reservoir near Gustine, Calif. California Gov. Jerry Brown and state lawmakers used the backdrop of California's most severe drought in nearly four decades to put the $7.5 billion water plan on the ballot earlier this week. Despite its size, the measure will not solve the problems created by the drought nor is it expected to prevent rationing during future ones. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)
California water bond won’t be a drought-buster
First Published Aug 16 2014 11:01 am • Last Updated Aug 16 2014 11:01 am

Sacremento, Calif. • Gov. Jerry Brown and state lawmakers are expected to use the backdrop of California’s most severe drought in nearly four decades to sell voters on the $7.5 billion water plan they put on the ballot this week.

Despite its size, the measure will not solve the problems created by the drought nor is it expected to prevent rationing during future ones. Instead, the projects it will fund are designed to provide a greater cushion when the state finds itself dealing with prolonged water shortages in the decades ahead.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"(The bond) doesn’t mean we can continue to run the tap," said Sen. Kevin de Leon, a Los Angeles Democrat who will become Senate leader in fall. "This is a stopgap measure ... It’s not a comprehensive panacea of dealing with the drought."

Many of the projects that will be funded through the measure, if voters approve it, are years away from providing any benefits, including a boost to desalination technology and cleaning up contaminated groundwater. With planning, environmental reports and construction, it could be a decade before the two reservoirs that are expected to be built under the plan could actually store any water.

"As you experience this (drought) more and more going forward, we got to have the infrastructure in place," Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, said the day the Legislature approved the water package. "But a drought buster? I’m hoping for more rain and better snowpack, and that then our infrastructure is prepared to hold those things."

The bond measure appearing on the November ballot as Proposition 1 asks voters to approve $7.1 billion in new borrowing and to redirect $425 million from past ballot propositions. It replaces an $11.1 billion bond that was negotiated in 2009 but was considered too expensive and too burdened with local, special interest projects to pass.

Many provisions in the new water measure are designed to increase the availability of water, including: $2.7 billion for water storage projects that include a reservoir north of Sacramento in Colusa County and another in the Sierra northeast of Fresno; $725 million for water recycling and treatment projects; and $900 million for cleaning up contaminated groundwater.

Some of these investments are the greatest in decades, but it will take years and additional matching money from local sources to make the projects become reality.

"It’s not going to mitigate the droughts as much as it’s going to help us prepare," said Senate Minority Leader Bob Huff, R-Diamond Bar.

Not everything in the water bond directly relates to future water supply. The second largest funding category sets aside $1.5 billion for ecosystem and watershed projects, while another $395 million is available for flood management.


story continues below
story continues below

Earlier this year, lawmakers passed a $687 million relief package to contend with some of the immediate effects of the drought, which has forced farmers to uproot orchards and leave fields unplanted, caused double-digit unemployment in counties heavily dependent on agriculture and led to a browning of the suburban landscape.

Proposition 1 would not necessarily prevent these scenes from playing out again.

"This isn’t the be-all and end-all of California water investment," said Mark Cowin, director of the state Department of Water Resources.

He said a coming update to the governor’s water action plan will say the total need for investing in California’s water infrastructure would approach $100 billion over the next decade. The plan says climate change and a growing population will mean California must fundamentally rethink how it manages water.

That includes a contentious proposal, supported by the governor, to build 35-mile-long, freeway-size water tunnels beneath the Northern California delta to divert Sacramento River water to Central Valley farms and Southern California. To avoid sparking a regional war at the ballot box, Proposition 1 prohibits the bond money from contributing to the tunnels’ $25 billion price-tag.

———

Fenit Nirappil can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/FenitN.



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.