Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Deal on veterans’ health care to cost $17B
First Published Jul 28 2014 07:47 pm • Last Updated Jul 28 2014 08:25 pm

Washington • A rare bipartisan deal in Congress would spend about $17 billion to help ease U.S. military veterans’ long waits for medical care.

The deal announced Monday expands the type of non-VA hospitals and clinics where veterans could receive care, authorizes leases for 27 new VA facilities, and allows the Department of Veterans Affairs secretary to fire senior executives.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

It includes about $12 billion in emergency spending and about $5 billion in offsets within the VA’s budget, said Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Jeff Miller. The Veterans Affairs Committee chairmen in their respective chambers announced the deal at a news conference in Washington.

"We are here together having done something that happens quite rarely in the United States Congress," said Sanders, referring to the two chambers as a "dysfunctional institution." Miller is a Florida Republican.

The agreement was reached almost two months after VA Secretary Eric Shinseki resigned, following an inspector general report that showed widespread mismanagement, such as keeping phony lists to hide the long waits veterans face for medical appointments. At least 35 veterans died while awaiting care in Phoenix, according to acting VA Secretary Sloan Gibson.

Sanders and Miller said they want both chambers to pass the measure by week’s end, when lawmakers are set to start a five-week break from the Capitol.

It probably faces a tougher sell in the Republican-led House, where lawmakers aligned with the small-government tea party wing have opposed attempts to spend emergency money.

Miller said he was confident he’d get the measure through the House, conceding that the vote probably won’t be unanimous. He said he’s been speaking with lawmakers about the measure at Republican conference meetings in recent weeks.

"As we’ve discussed in our conference throughout this process, taking care of our veterans is not inexpensive," Miller said.

Increased payments in the deal could triple health-care provider revenue from the VA in the next year, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Brian Friel and Jason McGorman. HCA Holdings Inc. and Universal Health Services Inc. hospitals had the most admissions among publicly traded hospitals in California, Texas and Florida, the three states with the most veterans.

story continues below
story continues below

The deal aims to contain costs by limiting eligibility to veterans who are already enrolled in VA health-care programs, those who live far from VA medical facilities and others who can’t quickly get an appointment at a VA clinic or hospital.

It also gives the VA secretary complete authority to immediately fire senior executives, while providing employees with streamlined appeal rights.

The House and Senate passed differing proposals to provide more funding and streamline waiting times, and a conference committee was appointed to come up with a final plan. The measure passed by the House cost $44 billion, while the Senate plan was $35 billion.

Republicans and Democrats involved in the negotiations had said they agreed on most policy changes, though financing remained a sticking point late last week.

Sanders last Thursday accused Republicans of being "not serious about negotiations," while Miller said Sanders had "moved the goal posts."

The VA, with a $160 billion budget, runs the nation’s largest integrated health-care system. An internal audit in June showed that more than 120,000 veterans hadn’t received a medical appointment or were waiting more than 90 days for care. That number was reduced to about 42,400 by July 1, VA data show.

A Senate committee last Wednesday unanimously approved former Procter & Gamble Chief Executive Officer Bob McDonald to lead the VA, sending his nomination to the full Senate.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.