Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
FILE - This May 15, 2014 file photo shows Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington. Veterans at the Phoenix veterans hospital waited on average 115 days for their first medical appointment _ 91 days longer than the hospital reported, the Veterans Affairs Department’s inspector general said Wednesday. Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., immediately called for VA Secretary Eric Shinseki to resign. Miller also said Attorney General Eric Holder should launch a criminal investigation into the VA. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)
GOP, Dems seek political gain over V.A. issues
First Published May 30 2014 08:09 pm • Last Updated May 30 2014 08:18 pm

Washington • Republicans and Democrats alike want it both ways when it comes to any misdeeds at veterans hospitals, each side accusing the other of seeking unseemly political gain from the misfortune of the nation’s warriors, while simultaneously maneuvering for an advantage in midterm elections.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee jumped in on Thursday, charging Republicans in key races with "politicizing (a) horrible crisis" for political gain — then accusing them of compiling "shameful, anti-veterans" records.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The same two-sided tactic had previously occurred to Republicans and their allies.

One House committee chairman, Rep. Jeff Miller of Florida, said the problems now coming to light at VA hospitals shouldn’t be used for political gain.

Yet the Republican National Committee announced it was making automated calls to voters in 10 states with Democratic-held Senate seats on the ballot. Veterans "deserve an independent investigation, not another political cover-up," the calls said.

An outside organization, the Republican-supporting Crossroads GPS, skipped the hand-wringing. It simply sought to lay at least partial responsibility for the poor treatment of veterans at the feet of Democratic Sen. Mark Begich of Alaska.

"A national disgrace," it says. "Veterans died waiting for care that never came. Sen. Mark Begich sits on the Veterans’ Affairs Committee."

The Alaskan was among a dwindling number of Senate Democrats in tough races this year to refrain from calling on Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki to step down.

A wounded veteran himself, Shinseki resigned on Friday after issuing a public apology to a veterans’ group for his agency’s performance. He had seemed to be serving on borrowed time since allegations surfaced that as many as 40 former members of the service may have died while awaiting care at the agency’s facilities in Phoenix.

The criticism intensified Wednesday after agency investigators issued a searing interim report that said 1,700 former members of the service seeking hard-to-get appointments at the Phoenix VA hospital never had been placed on the official waiting list and were at risk of being forgotten.

story continues below
story continues below

For a time on Wednesday and Thursday, the list of Democrats seeking Shinseki’s surrender seemed to grow hourly, despite a series of phone calls from the embattled Cabinet officer to key lawmakers. White House support for the former Army general seemed to be fading, and spokesman Jay Carney said President Barack Obama was awaiting a full investigation into the agency’s troubles before deciding who should be held accountable.

So far, the political moves have been low-budget, mass telephone calls, web-based attacks and television commercials that will air relatively infrequently. They’re likely to stay that way until it becomes clear how long-lasting the furor is.

It’s far too early for a full accounting of any misbehavior at the agency, and it is also impossible to predict how significant the political fallout will prove to be in elections this fall.

The polls to date are of little use in determining the ultimate political importance of the controversy. For the most part, public surveys don’t routinely ask voters how important veterans’ concerns are to them, or how they rank those issues in importance with the economy, health care, Medicare and other matters.

Already, though, it’s clear that anyone in either party who argues that the care of veterans should be ruled out of order for the campaign has been outvoted. In a landslide.

Justin Barasky, spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said Republicans had gone first. "We’re reacting to their attempt to play politics with veterans by encouraging a comparison of the candidates’ actual record on veterans. It’s a conversation we welcome," he said.

That may be better ground for Democrats than a pure discussion of shortcomings at the Department of Veterans Affairs. But it is not necessarily one that suits the political goals of Republicans.

Their objectives seem to be to draw attention to veterans-related problems now becoming evident during Obama’s presidency, and to create a broader impression that he has governed incompetently with the support of Democratic lawmakers.

Thus, the National Republican Senatorial Committee posted a blog on its website that said: "Democrats are in complete disarray. From the growing VA scandal to their increasingly unpopular health care law and show no sign of improvement."

House Republicans’ political counterpart jumped on Carney’s statement that Obama learned of the veterans hospital problems from media reports. "This isn’t the first time we’ve heard something like this," it said on its website.

Nor is it clear which side went first.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.