Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Appeals court upholds stronger soot standard
First Published May 10 2014 05:08 pm • Last Updated May 10 2014 05:08 pm

Washington • A federal appeals court on Friday rejected an industry challenge to stronger health standards for soot.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit says the Clean Air Act gives the Environmental Protection Agency substantial discretion in setting air quality standards.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The revisions followed a determination by the EPA that existing standards for fine particulate matter did not sufficiently protect public health. Fine particles can lodge deeply into lungs and cause serious health problems.

The appeals court ruled 3-0 that the industry simply had not identified any way in which the EPA acted unreasonably. The court said the EPA offered reasoned explanations for how it approached and weighed the evidence

The National Association of Manufacturers argued that the EPA’s revision to the standard was unreasonable.

The EPA eliminated a provision that could result in a standard that was not sufficiently protective of sensitive individuals. It also required the installation of additional monitors near heavily trafficked roads in urban areas where more than 1 million people live.

The industrial challengers said the EPA failed to request comment on whether to revise the standards and that it afforded too much weight to studies finding statistically significant associations between particulate matter and adverse health effects.

The challengers "simply have not identified any way in which EPA jumped the rails of reasonableness in examining the science," Judge Brett Kavanaugh ruled.

The ruling is the second recent victory for the EPA.

Last month, the Supreme Court backed federally imposed limits on smokestack emissions that cross state lines and burden downwind areas with bad air from power plants they can’t control.

story continues below
story continues below

Environmental groups praised Friday’s ruling.

Nick Morales, lead counsel on the case for Earthjustice, said the court ruling will save tens of thousands of lives and more than a billion dollars in health related costs every year. Earthjustice intervened in support of the EPA.

"The national air quality standards for particulate pollution that were affirmed by the court today provide a bedrock scientific foundation to ensure healthier, longer lives for our families," said Environmental Defense Fund attorney Peter Zalzal.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.