Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
FILE - In this November 2003 file photo is the reflecting pool in front of the Philip Morris USA headquarters in Richmond, Va. An Illinois appellate court on Tuesday, April 29, 2014 reinstated a decade-old $10.1 billion verdict in a class-action lawsuit against Phillip Morris USA that found the nation's biggest cigarette maker misled customers about "light" and "low tar" designations. Philip Morris swiftly decried Tuesday's ruling by a three-judge panel of the Mount Vernon-based 5th District Appellate Court, saying it would ask the Illinois Supreme Court to review the matter. (AP Photo/ Richmond Times-Dispatch, P. Kevin Morley)
Illinois court revives $10 billion verdict in cigarette suit
First Published Apr 30 2014 02:54 pm • Last Updated Apr 30 2014 02:54 pm

St. Louis • An Illinois appellate court has reinstated a decade-old $10.1 billion verdict in a class-action lawsuit against Phillip Morris USA that found the nation’s biggest cigarette maker misled customers about "light" and "low tar" designations.

Philip Morris swiftly decried Tuesday’s ruling by a three-judge panel of the Mount Vernon-based 5th District Appellate Court, saying it would ask the Illinois Supreme Court to review the matter. As that takes place, Philip Morris said, the latest decision is automatically stayed.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The appeals court ruling revived a 2003 verdict in Madison County that found Philip Morris broke Illinois law by marketing "light" and "low tar" cigarettes as safer than other cigarettes. The lawsuit was the nation’s first to accuse a tobacco company of consumer fraud.

The Illinois Supreme Court later threw out that verdict, saying the Federal Trade Commission allowed companies to characterize or label their cigarettes as "light" and "low tar." It said Philip Morris could not be held liable under state law even if the terms were misleading or false.

The U.S. Supreme Court let that ruling stand in late 2006, and Byron dismissed the case the next month.

But in a 5-4 decision in December 2008, the nation’s high court ruled in favor of three Maine residents who said smokers should be able to use state consumer protection laws to sue cigarette makers for promoting "light" and "low tar" brands.

Stephen Tillery, the attorney behind the Illinois class-action lawsuit, said that decision counted as new evidence and could be applied to reinstate his case. An Illinois appellate court agreed.

Subsequent appeals led to Tuesday’s reinstatement of the verdict.

The class-action lawsuit was filed in 2000 on behalf of perhaps more than one million people who bought "light" cigarettes in Illinois. The suit claimed Philip Morris knew when it introduced such cigarettes in 1971 and hid the fact that they were no healthier than regular cigarettes, and that "light" cigarettes actually contain a more toxic form of tar.

Tillery’s law firm said in a statement that Tuesday’s development was "yet another chapter in the long and tortuous history" of the legal saga, and that interest accrued over the 11 years since the original ruling should double the size of the judgment.


story continues below
story continues below

"We are pleased with the Fifth District’s well-reasoned decision and are happy that Philip Morris will finally be held accountable for deceiving Illinois consumers," Tillery said.

Vowing to appeal, the senior vice president and associate general counsel for Altria Client Services, which represents Richmond, Va.-based Altria Group Inc.’s subsidiary Philip Morris, argued that the appellate court overstepped.

"The law does not allow the Fifth District to reopen a decision by the Illinois Supreme Court based on speculation about the possible impact of subsequent events on the higher court’s ruling," Murray Garnick said in a statement.

Garnick also argued the appellate court erred in reinstating the verdict "despite the fact that the Illinois Supreme Court previously raised other problems with the judgment, including whether the case was properly certified as a class action."

The regulatory U.S. Food and Drug Administration now bars cigarette makers from using "light" or other descriptors without authorization.



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.