Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Judge tosses class-action push for Gmail suit
First Published Mar 19 2014 05:27 pm • Last Updated Mar 19 2014 05:28 pm

San Francisco • A judge has tossed out an effort to win class-action status for a lawsuit accusing Google of violating the privacy terms of email users.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh ruled late Tuesday that too many users have too many dissimilar claims to pursue a single class-action lawsuit that could expose the search engine giant to billions of dollars in potential losses.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

At issue is the scanning of contents of Gmail accounts and the related targeting of ads. Many other high-tech companies and email providers are closely watching the case, which is expected to better define privacy laws.

On Wednesday, Koh said it’s impossible to know which email users consented to Google’s privacy policies, complicating the push for class-action status.

The judge said "consent has been central to this case since its inception," and sorting out who knew and approved of Google’s automated sifting of their emails and who didn’t would be impossible.

Koh said some users might have actively consented to Google’s action, while others became aware of it through media reports.

"There is a panoply of sources from which email users could have learned of Google’s interceptions," she wrote.

Several similar lawsuits were filed across the country and were consolidated in Koh’s courtroom in San Jose.

Though the judge didn’t toss out the lawsuits, she barred lawyers from reformatting them to address her concerns and from asking again for class-action status.

"Usually the denial of class certification ends the lawsuits," said Eric Goldman, a Santa Clara University law professor. "It’s too expensive to pursue them individually. This is a fantastic ruling for Google."


story continues below
story continues below

Sean Rommel, one of the lawyers representing email users who sued Google, didn’t return a phone call seeking comment. He can appeal the decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

For its part, Google has maintained it does not open and read people’s emails. Instead, the company says its process is fully automated, and software scans for keywords to help it target advertisements to consumers.

"We’re glad the court agreed that we have been upfront about Gmail’s automated processing, which allows us to provide security and spam protection."



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.