Professors say University of Colorado shouldn’t have shared private info
The site visit report described a lack of transparency around disciplinary processes, which led to an "extremely harmful rumor mill."
Mayer said if the university could hold perpetrators publicly accountable, it might deter future offenders from acting.
"The actual perpetrators should be held accountable long before some climate study has to be called in to give recommendations and these drastic measures have to be taken," Mayer said. "There has to be some method by which a department can really be punitive about people who are sexual harassers, including if they’re tenured. There has to be some way for the university to address these issues ... ."
CU has fired a few tenured professors, for various reasons, in its history. In 2004, the university fired R. Igor Gamow, a tenured chemical engineering professor, for moral turpitude after allegations of sexual harassment and assault.
Lora Blakeslee Atkinson, executive director of Moving to End Sexual Assault, said assuring survivors of sexual assault and harassment that their identities will be protected plays a vital role in the recovery process.
"They’re concerned about people finding out, and our culture has a lot of victim-blaming still of survivors," she said. "When survivors feel that they do not have confidentiality, it makes them even more reluctant to report."
CU: Team used a ‘broad scale of input’
Attorney Steve Zansberg, president of the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition, said an argument could be made the university was fully within its rights by releasing confidential documents to the site team investigators but then may have violated the open records law when it released the site team report publicly.
Zansberg said if personnel or sexual harassment files, which are exempt from inspection under the law, are summarized or analyzed in a subsequent report, that document is also protected under the law.
He also said releasing the report without releasing the data used to create the report does not give the public, or members of the department, a chance to verify the validity of the report.
"It’s incumbent upon them to allow the public to monitor and assess the legitimacy of those findings," he said. "We routinely say that when a government entity affirmatively discloses information and then withholds the data upon which that information was based, that’s contradictory to the purposes of having an open records act. It becomes very difficult for the university to say, ‘Take these three researchers’ word for it.’"
CU spokesman Bronson Hilliard said the university does not feel it has violated the law either in sharing the confidential files with the site team investigators or by releasing the report publicly.
"There’s much more material in (the report) besides things that are in the individual files," he said. "The report’s writers went out of their way to take a broad scale of input from interviews with graduate students, with faculty, with undergraduates, with the deans, with department chairs."
Hilliard said he hopes victims of harassment and discrimination won’t be deterred from reporting.
"I hope that victims would take away . . . that the institution is acting and taking strong actions to remedy situations that might possibly have given rise to whatever it was they complained about," he said. "We want to take actions, we want to take situations that are not working for individuals and groups of people and make them better on the campus."
Contact Camera Staff Writer Sarah Kuta at 303-473-1106 or email@example.com.