Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Joe Boven | Colorado Progressive Coalition Denver resident and anti-poverty advocate Corrine Fowler was once a recipient herself of the Earned Income Tax Credit.
America’s most effective anti-poverty program is also its most overlooked
First Published Feb 04 2014 08:59 am • Last Updated Feb 04 2014 08:59 am

Most people dread filing their taxes. But for Denver resident Corrine Fowler, it turned out to be a lifesaver back in 1997.

Around Christmas, the then-22-year-old single mom lost both her jobs as an administrative clerk and hostess while putting herself through school. She had little money for the new year.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

But when Fowler filed her taxes, she learned that she qualified for the Earned Income Tax Credit, an often overlooked federal program that gives tax refunds to lower-income workers.

The $1,800 check she received helped her pay her rent until March, when she had landed a job as a bank teller.

"It really kept me from either becoming homeless or having to move in with my mother," said Fowler, who now works as an advocate for low-income families at the Colorado Progressive Coalition.

Her success story is echoed by millions of Americans who have benefited from the decades-old federal program, widely regarded by experts as one of the most effective anti-poverty programs in America. But it’s also a program that has come under increasing scrutiny from conservative pundits and lawmakers.

The EITC, as it’s known in wonkier circles, originally enjoyed bipartisan support in part because of what it’s not. Unlike traditional welfare programs, the refundable tax credit is contingent upon recipients having a job. President Gerald Ford, a Republican, signed it into law in 1975 with the support of conservative Democrats as an alternative to raising the minimum wage.

Since then it’s been expanded by both Republicans and Democrats, from Ronald Reagan to Bill Clinton, all with the intention of lifting Americans out of poverty by encouraging them to work through incentives written into the tax code.

When Reagan signed 1986 tax reform into law, which in part expanded the EITC, he called the bill "one of the most effective antipoverty programs in our history."

Economists agree with Reagan.

story continues below
story continues below

The tax credit helped more than 27 million Americans in 2011, according to the IRS. It’s fairly substantial, especially for families or single parents with children: A married couple with three children earning up to $51,500 in 2013 would have received as much as $6,000 back.

That refund goes a long way for families struggling to make ends meet, said Aparna Mathur, an economist with the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute. And because the tax credit is based on income, it phases out as families become more financially stable, another positive feature Mathur cited.

In addition, the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found children of EITC recipients did better in school and were more likely to attend college than working poor families who didn’t apply for the EITC.

"It’s just a transfer of money, and when people are on the margin between poverty and not, getting a few extra thousand dollars really helps," said Ben Harris, a fellow with the liberal-leaning think tank Brookings Institution.

The program is so effective that when President Obama mentioned in his State of the Union increasing how much the EITC gives to childless low-income workers, analysts considered it the biggest legislative proposal in the entire speech.

But this rare bipartisan success is at risk of late of becoming another political football, even as Washington spends the new year debating income inequality. High-profile Republicans such as Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah and Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma have recently attacked the credit as either too costly or too susceptible to abuse. One Republican, Sen. Marco Rubio, has even suggested scrapping it altogether.

In January, Rubio, a possible 2016 presidential candidate, suggested replacing the EITC with more regularly scheduled federal subsidies that would be delivered paycheck to paycheck as opposed to an annual refundable tax credit.

"This would allow an unemployed individual to take a job that pays, say, $18,000 a year — which on its own is not enough to make ends meet — but then receive a federal enhancement to make the job a more enticing alternative to collecting unemployment insurance," he said.

Critics have also zeroed in on alleged fraud, a result they claim of the program’s complicocated rules: An inspector general for the Treasury Department found that as many as 25 percent of the 2012 EITC payments were incorrect.

"Refundable tax credits are a nightmare to administer and lead to far too much of the American people’s money going out to those who aren’t eligible," Hatch, the ranking senator on the Senate Finance Committee, said in a statement in October.

The biggest attack came indirectly in 2012, when Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney was caught on tape telling fundraisers that 47 percent of Americans don’t pay income tax, arguing they are dependent on the government for resources and as a result unconditionally vote Democratic.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.