Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Lawmakers revisit COLA cut for military retirees
First Published Jan 28 2014 11:16 am • Last Updated Jan 28 2014 11:16 am

Washington • Congress is revisiting its decision to cut annual cost-of living adjustments to pensions for most working-age military retirees after talk of the cuts drew outrage from veterans groups and others.

The budget agreement approved this month reduced those adjustments by 1 percent annually once a service member retires until that retiree reaches age 62.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Lawmakers on the Senate Armed Services Committee, back from a week-long break in their home states, said they’re interested in repealing the COLA change that is scheduled to take effect Dec. 1, 2015. But Pentagon officials asked them to hold off on making any more changes until a commission completes an extensive review of compensation and retirement benefits. That report is due in February 2015.

Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said there is broad agreement to act more quickly.

"This is a wrong that should be fixed," Wicker said. "It doesn’t make any sense if we’re all in agreement on this to wait, unless you want to hold out the possibility that we’ll stick with it."

Christine Fox, the acting deputy secretary of defense, said compensation rates are unsustainable and changes need to be made to ensure military readiness, but the department was never consulted about the COLA cut. She said the Pentagon prefers a more comprehensive review of the retirement system that would exempt current service members and retirees from the changes made. She also said the Defense Department does not support the COLA cut unless it includes such a grandfather clause.

The pension program for military retirees is generally much more generous than those found in the private sector. Most people work at least 40 years for about 20 years of retirement benefits. Military retirees generally work about 20 years for about 40 years of retirement benefits.

In studying the future cost of military retirement, the Defense Business Board said in a 2011 report that military retirement costs would seriously undermine future military warfighting capabilities if changes were not made. That group is an advisory panel of business leaders that provides counsel to Pentagon leadership.

Overall, the pension cut approved by Congress reduces lifetime retirement pay by about 6 percent, from $1.7 million to $1.6 million — for an Army sergeant first class retiring at age 38.

Veterans groups argue that the pension helps to make up for the toll that 20-plus years in the military can take on a veteran, and it’s a big reason why service members choose to pursue a military career. Veterans view paring it back as a breach of faith.

story continues below
story continues below

And many voters seem to agree. During a press conference leading up to the hearing, Sen. Mark Begich, D-Ala., said his office is getting more calls about the COLA cut than any other issue, including the health insurance overhaul.

"When you put this issue out there in front of the American people, they’re outraged," Paul Rieckhoff, chief executive officer for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said at the press conference.

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., told veteran groups at the hearing that lawmakers overwhelmingly agree with them.

"You guys have won," Inhofe observed.

The COLA change saves the Defense Department roughly $500 million a year. Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, says it was wrong to single out military retirees in the effort to reduce the deficit. Not a single member of the committee voiced disagreement.

The COLA change is scheduled to take effect at the end of 2015, which Fox said gives a Military and Retirement Modernization Commission time to come up with its recommendations.

"Because of the complexity of retirement issues," Fox said, "we would respectfully ask that the Congress not make any more changes until the commission completes its work."

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.