Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Analysis: For House GOP leadership, trust isn’t working
First Published Oct 10 2013 08:27 am • Last Updated Oct 10 2013 08:27 am

The House Republican leadership no longer trusts its own members when it comes to seeking a solution to the deadlock over the closing of the government and dealing with the debt limit.

That’s what’s behind Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, refusing to allow a House vote on a "clean" continuing resolution (CR) that would provide appropriations to reopen the government for a limited period while also working out compromises that would raise the debt limit.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Boehner has repeatedly said publicly that House Republicans would be able to defeat such a measure, but if that were the case he would have allowed a vote as he has on other Democratic measures that eventually lost.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Tuesday that there is a majority of 200 Democrats and 20 Republicans on record supporting the Senate-passed CR. As of Wednesday, The Washington Post has counted as many as 22 Republicans.

Even Boehner’s most recent legislative gimmick, a bill to establish "a bicameral working group on deficit reduction and economic growth," reflects the same mistrust of fellow GOP House members, even those he would appoint to the group were it to be established.

Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Tex., chairman of the House Rules Committee, said on the House floor Tuesday that the measure was "an idea from our speaker, . . . Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and our whip, Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), and a couple of people who are in the Republican leadership."

The working group was to have 20 members, 10 each from the House and Senate. The speaker would name six House members, one of whom would be vice chairman. Pelosi would name four. In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., would name six, including the other vice chairman, and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., would name four.

Although the working group’s goal would be to deal with "deficit reduction and economic growth," its recommendations were to be limited to:

— Overall levels of discretionary spending, including for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2014.

— Changes in the statutory limit on the public debt.


story continues below
story continues below

— Reforms in direct spending programs.

What’s missing from the list and "off the table" are any revenue-raising measures to help do away with tax loopholes.

If that were not enough of a sign that House leaders did not want their nominees to wander off the GOP anti-tax reservation, another provision for the panel was the so-called Hastert rule, named for former speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill.

Under this measure, which passed the House on Tuesday 227 to 94, for any recommendation by the group to be reported back to the full Congress, it must receive the "support of a majority of the members appointed by both the speaker of the House of Representatives and the majority leader of the Senate."

In short, unless four of the six House Republicans appointed by the speaker (a majority of the majority) supported a deficit-reduction proposal, it would not be recommended by the 20-member group. So the speaker has built into his own proposal that three of his appointees could block anything that emerged.

It echoes what White House press secretary Jay Carney said of the GOP approach in his briefing Wednesday about the overall situation. "Right now Congress - because of a minority of one party in Congress, one branch of government, the American economy, the American middle class, all of us, are being held hostage."

Needless to say, though the Boehner working group measure has been sent to the Senate, it has little chance of passage.

It’s a good example of the thrashing around within the House Republican leadership as they seek a way out of the mess they have created.

While the speaker’s bill to create the working group was on the floor, Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., described it as a "convoluted, cockamamie legislative effort that is going absolutely nowhere. . . . Another ‘message bill’ that is designed to win today’s news cycle but that gets us no closer to resolving this crisis."

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.