Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Lamplighters procession marches along the Promenade, towards the Burning Man, carrying the cauldron with the flame that will start the festivities at Burning Man 2012, in the Black Rock Desert, NV, September 1, 2012.
Burning Man appeals probation over crowd size
Nevada » Organizers of desert festival fighting feds over threats to pull license.
First Published Apr 22 2012 10:15 pm • Last Updated Apr 23 2012 08:07 am

Reno, Nev. • Already reeling from a ticket snafu, organizers of the Burning Man counterculture festival on the Nevada desert now have another fight on their hands.

They’re challenging the federal government’s decision to place them on probation — and threats to pull their license — for exceeding the crowd cap last year at the largest outdoor arts festival in North America.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The Bureau of Land Management took the action against Black Rock City LLC after its offbeat art and music festival drew daily crowds of more than 53,000 on both Sept. 2 and 3 last year in the Black Rock Desert, 110 miles north of Reno.

BRC was issued a notice of noncompliance decision for exceeding the daily population cap of 50,000 allowed under terms of its special recreation permit for the weeklong celebration of radical self-expression leading up to Labor Day, said Gene Seidlitz, manager of the BLM’s Winnemucca Field Office.

It’s the first time Burning Man has been placed on probation since moving from San Francisco to the Nevada desert in 1990. The gathering, known for drum circles, decorated art cars, guerilla theatrics and colorful theme camps, is overseen by the BLM because it’s staged on public land.

If organizers are placed on probation two straight years, Seidlitz warned, the agency may suspend or cancel Burning Man’s permit and/or deny future permit applications.

He said it’s important that organizers stay within the population cap because planning for law enforcement, sanitation and other services needed for the festival is based on that figure.

"It’s a huge liability for BLM to ensure we have enough staff in place to do monitoring and logistical support, and for law enforcement to handle that number of participants so it’s safe and secure and everyone can enjoy it," Seidlitz told The Associated Press.

BRC is appealing the agency’s decision to the Interior Board of Land Appeals, which has set no timetable for reaching a decision.

Burning Man spokeswoman Marian Goodell declined to comment.

story continues below
story continues below

Seidlitz said Burning Man’s probationary status does not jeopardize this year’s event. His agency issues special recreation permits for the event on an annual basis, and has yet to grant one for this year.

The probationary status also will not delay the BLM’s action on an environmental assessment concerning the effect of BRC’s request to gradually increase the festival’s daily population cap to 70,000 over the next five years, he said. A decision is expected by early June.

Organizers’ request to increase the capacity comes after the festival sold out for the first time last year. The sell-out forced organizers to sell the bulk of this year’s tickets through random drawings, but demand exceeded supply because of the event’s popularity, leaving many regulars out in the cold and angry.

Goodell said organizers now hope to secure approval for the higher crowd cap. Even if the request is granted, they still would have to secure a special recreation permit each year.

Some festival neighbors fault BRC for exceeding last year’s population cap, saying it was intentional.

"Here you have a multimillion-dollar business and you can’t even count," said Ron Cole, owner of the Dog Ranch near the Black Rock Desert. The gathering already is having adverse impacts on the environment and traffic, he said, and should be restricted to a crowd cap of 50,000.

Both sides have submitted written arguments over the appeal to the federal appeals board.

Charles Yordy, counsel to the board, didn’t immediately return a phone call.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.