Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Sexy ‘Lolita’ style for kids raising concerns

First Published Apr 09 2011 04:58 pm • Last Updated Apr 09 2011 07:24 pm

Atlanta • It was a short run.

A $25 bikini top targeting preteens crashed and burned a few weeks after public outcry sent executives at Abercrombie Kids slinking back to the boardroom to revisit their marketing strategy.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The "Ashley," a padded "push-up" triangle bikini top peddled to girls ages 7 to 14, was first "recategorized," according to a company statement released on Facebook last week.

"We agree with those who say it is best ‘suited’ for girls age 12 and older," said the statement from Abercrombie Kids, a division of Abercrombie & Fitch. The "Ashley" disappeared from the website.

An online firestorm saw parents and kids criticizing the company for promoting the sexualization of young girls, which, of course, is nothing new. Princesses of pop culture are the frequent targets of concerned parents as stars such as Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan pass the baton to the likes of Miley Cyrus and Demi Lovato.

"It has been going on for the last 10 years," said Meenakshi Gigi Durham, assistant professor at the University of Iowa and author of "The Lolita Effect: The Media Sexualization of Young Girls and What We Can Do About It" (Overlook, $24.95). "Abercrombie & Fitch has been nailed before for this sort of thing. They have always been pushing the sexualization of little girls, so I can’t say I was surprised."

It was surprising to see the product disappear — presumably in response to public pressure.

"I do know that in many places, there are conversations about this sort of thing and there is a lot more public discourse about it and that is encouraging that there is some push back," Durham said.

Public opinion on the topic is pretty clear. Two recent polls on an opinion website, SodaHead.com, show 51 percent of respondents agreeing that "young girls dress too sexy."

Eighty-five percent of respondents in a separate poll said Abercrombie Kids’ padded bikini top is not OK for little girls.

story continues below
story continues below

What parents consider inappropriate garments extends beyond outfits at Abercrombie Kids.

There are kitten heels in sizes small enough for 4-year-olds and T-shirts with sexy sayings sized to fit newborns at Gymboree.

Macy’s carries tops for juniors that leave little to the imagination, such as a bandeau with sequins from Material Girl, a line launched last year by Madonna with input from her then-13-year-old daughter, Lourdes.

Further complicating matters of appropriateness is the fact that the target age range of 7 to 14 designated by many retailers crosses three very different phases in the life of girls: tweens, preteens and teens.

Parents — concerned about the negative impact that supersexy dressing might have on their daughters, from eating disorders to sexually transmitted infections — have fought back in their own way.

In 2005, Brenda Sharman co-founded Pure Fashion, a faith-based organization that encourages young girls to live, dress and behave with modesty, in the metro Atlanta area.

Each year the organization, which totals 600 participants nationwide, holds a Pure Fashion show featuring age- and style-appropriate hair, makeup and clothing.

Sharman was introduced to Abercrombie & Fitch several years ago. A friend showed her a company catalog with "XXX" on the cover and naked models on the pages. Later, for an appearance on the "Dr. Phil" show, Sharman went to the store for the first time and purchased a $60, 8-inch skirt as a visual aid.

"When you walk in [the store] and see they have removed the clothing from the models in order to sell clothing, you know they aren’t selling clothing. They are selling an attitude. They are selling sex," Sharman said. "Girls and parents need to realize when they support a store that promotes such an obvious message, they encourage [the message]."

Considering parents’ reaction, why aren’t retailers doing more to end the hyper-sexy trend in little girls’ clothing?

"For corporations, it is all about inculcating very young children into a certain ideology of femininity and sexuality that is geared to consumption," Durham said. "They want very young children to be aware of the trappings of sexuality that the marketers insist are necessary to present yourself as an attractive, viable female. All of these sexy garments ... are part of that push."

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.