Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Tribune file photo) . Utah athletic director Chris Hill
Utah AD Chris Hill says labor ruling implications are murky

Utah A.D. says there are more questions than answers in Northwestern players’ bid to unionize.

First Published Mar 27 2014 01:06 pm • Last Updated Mar 27 2014 10:24 pm

Utah Athletic Director Chris Hill said Thursday that he supports consideration of an increased stipend for student-athletes and even potentially allowing them to pursue endorsement deals, but that on the whole he believes the current NCAA student-athlete model is "pretty successful."

Hill said he’s still digesting Wednesday’s National Labor Relations Board ruling that football players at Northwestern University can unionize, and that it’s too early to say what the implications are, even for Northwestern.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Of himself and other athletic directors who have followed the case, Hill said, "Most all of us really don’t fully understand what this ruling means, [or] fully understand what the players are asking for."

Only private universities are regulated by the labor board. In the ruling, NLRB Regional Director Peter Sung Ohr found that college football players at these schools meet the definition of employee: Coaches are their managers and scholarships are their compensation.

Therefore, as employees, they have a right to unionize.

Plaintiffs seeking the right to form what they have called the College Athletes Players Association cited, among other things, a desire to secure guaranteed medical expenses for former players. But the decision might also allow athletes at private universities to demand increased pay or sponsorships. Schools might have to pay minimum wage, and activities and gear might fall under Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards.

Utah junior wideout Kenneth Scott said after practice Thursday that employment status could be "a distraction."

"We don’t need all that," Scott said. "We’re just here to play ball. I don’t see the benefit really, to be honest with you. … As long as my degree’s getting paid for, I’m good."

David Murphy, a labor attorney with Dorsey & Whitney, said that if Northwestern’s players vote to form a union, the school will likely appeal and the NLRB is likely to uphold the decision. From there a further challenge would go to directly to the federal appellate court.

Murphy said he also expects state and national legislators to begin proposing laws that exempt college athletic departments from NLRB oversight.

story continues below
story continues below

"In a state where college football is key and there’s a lot of pressure on labor unions …, I can’t imagine that’s not going to happen," he said.

The most visible — and from the NCAA’s standpoint, possibly the most potentially devastating — effort to secure compensation for college athletes was born in the Pac-12 Conference: O’Bannon v. NCAA.

In a federal antitrust class action lawsuit filed by former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon, plaintiffs argue that student-athletes are entitled to financial compensation for the NCAA’s use of their image.

If a jury rules in the plaintiffs’ favor, athletes may be entitled to a large cut of television revenue and the entire system of college sports might be turned on its head. The case is scheduled for trial June 9.

Speaking broadly about whether student-athletes are fairly compensated for the countless hours many devote to sports — and for the money they generate for schools and conferences — Hill said.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.