Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Utah head coach Kyle Whittingham and Utah quarterback Brian Johnson (3) hold their trophy aloft after the Utes defeated Alabama in the 75th annual Sugar Bowl in New Orleans, Friday, January 2, 2009. Scott Sommerdorf/The Salt Lake Tribune)
Kragthorpe: Utah should praise BCS in its demise

By Kurt Kragthorpe

Tribune columnist

First Published Jan 06 2014 01:54 pm • Last Updated Jan 07 2014 09:27 am

The Utah Utes might have been preparing for another game instead of parading down State Street after beating Alabama in the Sugar Bowl five years ago.

Rather than having a month to get ready for Monday’s BCS National Championship Game, Florida State and Auburn would have played semifinal contests on New Year’s Day.

At a glance

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

As the maligned Bowl Championship Series goes away, here’s a final tribute to a system that actually was very good to Utah and a welcome to a formula that has won me over, on the basis of simple math: The College Football Playoff will deliver three highly meaningful games, not just one.

And it means Utah never again will finish 13-0 and feel unfulfilled. After the Sugar Bowl, asked about a hypothetical meeting with Florida, Ute coach Kyle Whittingham said, "You tell us where to be and when to be there, and we will be there, I can tell you that."

In the playoff format, the Utes would have known where they were headed next. Yet before history is revised too much in our imaginations, here’s the reality: Utah may not have been invited in 2008. That would have been unfair, certainly. But looking back, the Utes should appreciate what the BCS did for them, rather than just wish the playoff had come sooner.

We’ll never know what a selection committee would have done — or precisely what criteria the group will use, beginning next season. But in 2004, when USC, Oklahoma and Auburn also were unbeaten, Utah would have competed with Texas and California for the No. 4 spot. The Utes were No. 5 in the last AP Top 25 of the regular season and No. 6 in the BCS standings, sending them to the Fiesta Bowl vs. Pittsburgh.

The 2008 Utes played high-profile games vs. TCU and BYU in the Mountain West and were the only unbeaten team. Yet the Utes again were No. 6 in the BCS and only No. 7 in the AP poll, so a committee would have had to make a subjective pick to include them over Alabama or USC.

As it was, just getting to the Sugar Bowl basically earned Whittingham two contract extensions and increased the Utes’ marketability to the Pac-12.

The next issue is whether the Utes can take advantage of the opportunity the Pac-12 gives them. Stanford probably wouldn’t have made the four-team cut with two defeats — thanks partly to Utah — but a one-loss Pac-12 champion should make the playoffs.

Other nice opportunities exist outside of the playoffs for Utah schools, just as in the BCS era. When they’re not hosting a semifinal game, the Fiesta, Chick-fil-A and Cotton bowls will be filled by the selection committee, which brings BYU into play. As for Utah State, the highest-rated member of a league outside of the power conferences is promised a spot.

story continues below
story continues below

So the kind of big-bowl access the BCS provided basically is intact, and the playoff will enhance the postseason.

But there’s a trade-off. The regular season will be devalued just enough to change college football as we know it. In the case of 2013, Alabama’s stunning loss to Auburn would have affected only the Crimson Tide’s seeding, rather than knocking them out of the playoffs.

Players and coaches also will face the emotional demands of another game, although that’s done on all other levels of football.

"It’s what we’ll have to do, and kids will adjust and they’ll adapt," Florida State coach Jimbo Fisher said before Monday’s game. "But it’s going to be a challenge. It’s going to be that much harder to get to where you want to go, that’s for sure."

No tougher than it was for the ’08 Utes, who had to be told to stop.


Twitter: @tribkurt

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.