Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Scott Sommerdorf | The Salt Lake Tribune) Utah head coach Anthony Levrets yells at his players after Notre Dame got an easy basket on a back cut to the hoop during first half play. Notre Dame led Utah 36-33 at the half in a first round NCAA tournament game played at the University of Utah's Hunstman Center, Saturday, March 19, 2011.
Pay to Play: Nonrevenue sports could ‘lose’ if NCAA amateurism ends
Fallout » Coaches fear gains being rolled back; athletic directors say it won’t happen.
First Published Aug 16 2014 01:08 pm • Last Updated Aug 17 2014 10:18 am

A hard fact looms over all this talk of change in college sports.

Somebody has to lose.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

If football and men’s basketball players are to have a greater share of the revenue pie, then somebody else’s slice must get thinner.

It seems unlikely that those somebodies will be the commissioners, athletic directors and coaches who are paid top dollar because (their organizations believe) they drive revenue in college football and basketball that keeps the rest of the operation afloat.

After all, University of Utah officials didn’t make Kyle Whittingham the state’s highest-paid employee — about $2.4 million annually — because he’s such a nice guy. They think they got a deal.

In 2012-13, revenues less expenses for Whittingham’s football team totaled $13.3 million, according to the Department of Education. Take football out of the equation, and all the rest of the sports combined lost $9.7 million.

At a sit-down after Pac-12 Media Days last month, a reporter asked Commissioner Larry Scott if he believes nonrevenue sports are vulnerable amid a sea change in the NCAA.

"I do if there are some radical solutions that get foist[ed] upon us by the courts, like employee-employer status, collective bargaining, being able to pay student-athletes whatever their market value," he said. "If that happens, so much of the existing resources are going to get sucked toward football and away from the 7,000 student athletes and $126 million in scholarship money we’re giving across the board."

Scott wrote a column earlier this year for USA Today, on the heels of a decision by the National Labor Relations Board that allowed Northwestern football players to unionize, that warned such actions could "destroy" college sports.

For now, Utah women’s basketball coach Anthony Levrets says he’s trying to focus on what he can control.


story continues below
story continues below

However, he acknowledges, the fear that many of the positive changes through the years to give nonrevenue athletes more opportunities could be taken off the table. "You hope to never see those kind of things go away," Levrets says.

Change is only natural, says Utah women’s soccer coach Rich Manning. As it comes, though, "there’s going to be different parties pulling to get their share of it."

Manning believes Title IX and federal financial-aid regulations will prevent things from getting too out of whack for nonrevenue teams.

Utah Athletic Director Chris Hill has further assured Manning — with the caveat that neither he nor anybody knows exactly where this is all going — that Utah’s student-athletes always will be his first priority.

Manning says revenues from Utah’s success and move to the Pac-12 have helped his team in recent years, and that when the football and men’s basketball teams get extra services — nutritionists, trainers and a sports psychologist — that it benefits his team, as well.

"We hope that this seismic shift continues to support all athletes," he says.

Still, even if nonrevenue sports emerge unscathed financially, there are questions about competitive balance in those areas. For instance, the NCAA v. O’Bannon ruling would allow football and men’s basketball players to receive full cost-of-attendance stipends and to profit off their likenesses by at least $5,000 per year — to be placed in a trust until after they leave the school. What if that ruling were extended to all sports — as logic and Title IX seem to dictate? Could North Carolina then go out and create a U.S. Women’s National Team lite for its women’s soccer program?

Manning says "that’s for sure one of the question marks," although he believes that in women’s soccer, without the lure of a top-dollar pro league, most players are more concerned with how a school will help them begin their off-the-field careers.

mpiper@sltrib.com

Twitter: @matthew_piper



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.