Chris Hill went before reporters Tuesday morning, alongside the investigators of the University of Utah swim scandal and school president David Pershing, and for the first time addressed his role in the now-infamous athletics department screw-up. And all the apologists out there can save it. Hill did mess this thing over in a big way.
He called one of his blunders "my big mistake." That was the one where he didn’t act when he should have after Ute swim coach Greg Winslow got in a fight while he was drunk and out of control. Winslow punched his assistant Charlie King outside a bar — just a single bit of evidence of the coach’s alcohol-abuse problem that had a hugely detrimental effect on an already troubled program. It’s a program that had experienced claims by athletes and athletes’ parents of a coach subjecting those swimmers to physical and psychological abuse.
Alan Sullivan, one of the investigators, said it this way: "It’s hard for us to understand why the athletics department would choose to retain Winslow as coach after he physically assaulted his assistant coach Charlie King in a drunken rage in July 2011. We think Winslow should have been terminated. … The department failed in its duty to the athletes in that regard."
Sullivan added: "We don’t believe Chris Hill paid attention to the problem."
And Hill agreed.
"There’s no reason I shouldn’t have taken a look at that more deeply," he said. "And I know if I’d looked at it more deeply and knew what was going on, I knew what I would have done."
But he did nothing.
Asked why he did nothing, he repeated that it was a mistake: "No excuses."
And he said he was really sorry.
So was Pershing, the man who could have fired Hill but decided to keep him. Pershing apologized, too, to the athletes in the swim program who had been affected adversely by Winslow’s behavior and expressed distress at Hill’s lack of action.
"I’m disappointed that Chris Hill did not exercise sufficient oversight of the associate athletic director who had responsibility for the swimming program," he said. "Specifically, given the seriousness of the complaints about coach Winslow, I would have expected Chris to follow up frequently and seriously with the associate AD."
He did not, and Winslow continued to coach at the school.
Pershing labeled the episodes within the program "painful events," and added that the school would "strengthen the oversight of our athletic programs to make sure nothing like this ever occurs again."
The entire news conference was an embarrassment for Hill, who was raked by investigators and the president for his missteps. And he was emotional, calling the wellbeing of the school’s student-athletes the "core" of his administrative philosophy.
He apologized to Utah’s other coaches, who try to attract the kind of talent that will make their individual programs successful, for allowing events to transpire that publicly put that core at the university into question.
Either Hill is Laurence Olivier or he was sincere about his contrition.
The AD’s tone was perfect for the occasion.
His voice shook. The plumbing in his eyes backed up a moment he later referred to as the point where "I was losing it." He looked ashen. And he seemed sorry, like a man who knew he was lucky to still have his job. More importantly, he acted like a suddenly humbled administrator who had learned from his mistakes and who needed to do his job better.
In truth, he’ll have no real choice. Under the new recommendations coming out of the swim mess, backed now by Pershing, it was announced that Hill will have two empowered babysitters, one on his left and one on his right, who will track separately the behavior of coaches and the responses of athletes under Hill’s watch, keeping a vigilant eye on the way student-athletes are treated and attended to by administrators and coaches.
Pershing said Hill will have no control over the dogs on the watch.
Other recommendations coming from the investigative committee are that coaches will have behavioral standards to follow and those standards must be enforced. Hill said the details of those expectations will be specific enough to go down to the level of how coaches respond when, say, an athlete is late for practice. Coaches also should have in place for them treatment scenarios, or consequences, in the case of alcohol or substance abuse.Next Page >
Copyright 2013 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.