Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Monson: Hey, Einstein, Arizona’s win over Harvard a matter of physics

By Gordon Monson

| Tribune Columnist

First Published Mar 23 2013 08:01 pm • Last Updated Mar 24 2013 12:29 am

Never have read Einstein’s paper on special relativity — maybe some of the Harvard student-athletes had — called "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," written a century ago, but it might have explained some of what happened between the Crimson and the Wildcats on Saturday.

Turns out, Arizona’s moving bodies were bigger than Harvard’s — and more energetic. Something about the mass of a body is a measure of its energy content? Beats me. But while we’re mixing and matching theories, how about this one:

Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Slower, smaller bodies don’t hang with faster, larger ones.

It would have taken all of a few minutes for a blind man to grasp as much in Game 1 of the two-game NCAA Tournament set at EnergySolutions Arena.

Harvard missed its first 13 shots. Eight minutes in, it was already 17-2, Wildcats. The Crimson, who utilized timely and accurate shooting to upset New Mexico on Thursday, didn’t hit their first field goal in this game until the 12:14 mark of the first half. By then, it was over.

"That doomed us from the start," Harvard coach Tommy Amaker said.

So, let’s keep it all straight and simple: Harvard tried real hard in what turned out to be a 74-51 loss. But Cinderella had a couple of huge crimson zits on her nose here. Arizona was better in every aspect, much of it centering on that speed and size differential, on the basic laws of physics and mechanics.

"Getting the ball down low is something we wanted to do, and controlling the boards," said Arizona forward Solomon Hill. "We had a bigger team, so controlling the boards and limiting them on second shots really controlled the game."

Said Harvard guard Christian Webster: "They pounced on us from the beginning. I think it took us by surprise how hard they played, how physical they were, and ... their length and size and speed. From there, it was just an uphill battle."

An impossible battle.


story continues below
story continues below

One of the major pieces for the Wildcats was Hill. In a 14-second stretch in the first half, he hit a 3 from the corner, and then ripped a ridiculous two-handed flying jam that gave Arizona a 30-9 lead. A few minutes later, point guard Mark Lyons, who scored 27 points on 12-of-17 shooting, flipped in consecutive alley-oops, the second one moving the lead to 34-15.

In response, the Crimson could do nothing.

They didn’t score from inside and they couldn’t score from outside. They wished they could have thought of another place from which to try. Actually, that one place was the free-throw line, where they outscored the Wildcats, 14-11.

Even when Harvard made shots, the degree of difficulty made it clear to the Crimson that the Arizona defense would yield nothing easy to them.

"They were tremendous on defense, their rotations, their size," said Harvard guard Siyani Chambers. "Their length was a problem, but give all the credit to them; they played a great game and they played great defense."

Wesley Saunders, Harvard’s top scorer this season, was 1 of 11 from the floor. "Wesley didn’t finish, and he’s our best finisher," Amaker said. Laurent Rivard, who played such an important role against the Lobos, was 1 of 6, all of those attempts coming from long range. "They locked down on him," said Amaker. Chambers hit just 2 of 8 shots. "They did an outstanding job of guarding our shooters," Amaker said.

"The shots we missed at the beginning were open," Webster said. "We should have made them. If we would have made the shots, maybe the game would have been different."

And if the Crimson had been bigger and longer and faster, the game would have been different, too.

All the smaller numbers added up to the bigger ones on the scoreboard:

Arizona hit 27 field goals, Harvard 16.

Arizona made 9 of 15 from beyond the arc, Harvard just 5 of 18.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.