Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Chris Detrick | The Salt Lake Tribune) Utah Jazz shooting guard Raja Bell #19 and Utah Jazz small forward Andrei Kirilenko #47 during the first half of the game Thursday October 28, 2010. Phoenix is winning the game 58-42.
Luhm: Retire Andrei Kirilenko’s No. 47? Not a bad idea

By Steve Luhm

| The Salt Lake Tribune

First Published Jan 05 2013 04:05 pm • Last Updated May 05 2013 11:32 pm

The Jazz have retired eight numbers in franchise history.

It might be time to make it nine.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Andrei Kirilenko loped back into Utah last week, this time as a member of the Minnesota Timberwolves.

His homecoming got me thinking.

Should Kirilenko’s familiar No. 47 someday hang from the ceiling at EnergySolutions Arena?

I think so.

Despite his massive contract that limited future roster moves because of salary cap and luxury tax concerns …

Despite the injuries that forced him to miss almost one in every four games during his final six seasons with the Jazz …

Despite the fact he never became quite the player his skills would have allowed if he’d worked a little harder and not relied so much on his God-given ability …

After 10 seasons in Utah, Kirilenko is among the top eight in every major statistical category in franchise history.

story continues below
story continues below

He is second in blocked shots behind Mark Eaton, whose No. 53 has been retired.

Only four players, led by Hall of Famers John Stockton and Karl Malone, handed out more assists.

Only five players, including Malone, Stockton and Hall of Famer Adrian Dantley, scored more points.

After his long-running feud with owner Larry Miller, even Dantley had his No. 4 retired in 2007 by the team he carried during its early years in Utah.

At the time, hard feelings were put aside and Dantley received an overdue honor — one that Kirilenko someday deserves.

Statistically, it’s clear the native Russian fits the mold of the Jazz players whose jerseys won’t be worn again.

But what about those other issues?

Well, I’m not certain anybody can begrudge the six-year, $86 million contract he signed after his only All-Star season in 2004.

I remember talking to general manager Kevin O’Connor during those negotiations.

When I asked if Kirilenko was a player worth a maximum contract, O’Connor smiled and said, "Oh, yeah. I think he’s pretty close."

At the time, the deal made sense.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.