Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Jeremy Harmon | The Salt Lake Tribune) This home at 739 Parkway Drive in North Salt Lake was destroyed by a landslide on Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2014.
Early study warned of potential landslides at Eaglepointe
Geology » But “notorious” clay bedrock isn’t mentioned in supplemental study.
First Published Aug 24 2014 01:01 am • Last Updated Aug 24 2014 11:19 am

Although a 2003 geotechnical report warned of the potential for landslides at Eaglepointe Estates in North Salt Lake, a 2013 supplemental study made no mention of the clay bedrock flagged for attention in the first and that one geologist called "a notorious bad boy" for instability.

There is no written review of the developer-commissioned June 2013 geotechnical study that pronounced as "globally stable" the lots at the crown of the massive landslide that crushed one house and damaged a tennis club on the morning of Aug. 5.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Ten residents escaped the house uninjured. The residents of another house on Parkway Drive remain unable to return until safety-mitigation measures are completed.

Paul Ottoson, city engineer for North Salt Lake, said his department "typically" does not produce written reviews of such reports or send them to other specialists for review. The city, he said, relies on geotechnical engineers’ reports before giving the go-ahead for building.

"We just look to see if it’s good to go," Ottoson said of the 2013 report.

The slide occurred after several days of heavy rains that may have triggered the event — as the report 11 years earlier had warned. That earlier geotechnical study said there was a potential for "landsliding" in that area if the clay bedrock was exposed to too much water.

The more recent June 12, 2013, report from GSH Geotechnical Inc., of Salt Lake City, was commissioned by Sky Properties, the developer of Eaglepointe. It was a supplemental study to the April 29, 2003, report by California-based Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants — also hired by Sky Properties.

An early warning » The 2003 report said the North Salt Lake foothills were generally suitable for development. It noted, however, that some areas needed more analysis to avoid potential hazards.

"Based on [geologic hazard] maps," it said, "a more detailed study on portions of the proposed development is suggested for surface fault rupture, landslide and debris flow."

story continues below
story continues below

That report makes numerous references to the geology of the Eaglepointe area. Portions of it were a gravel quarry at one time and the gravel and sand of that alluvial formation sit upon clay bedrock.

The report looked at a 1998 slide at the nearby Springhill development, which also sits atop bedrock geologists label Norwood Tuff — a tuffaceous clay. When the clay gets wet, it becomes slippery and unstable, according to geologists.

"We believe the landsliding at Springhill subdivision was triggered by the unusual heavy precipitation and attendant increase in groundwater levels," the report states.

Kimm Harty, deputy director of the Utah Geological Survey, called Norwood Tuff a "notorious bad boy" for instability. But she added that she did not know the cause of the North Salt Lake slide.

The 2003 report goes on to say that lands nearby could be vulnerable to the same phenomenon. "Several subdivisions and the Eaglewood Golf Course are up gradient from the Springhill subdivision. Future increased contribution of water from these developments or other unknown up-gradient sources could be a factor in landsliding."

No mention of bedrock » The 2013 supplemental report does not mention bedrock or tuffaceous clay.

GSH refused to comment and referred questions to Sky Properties.

Scott Kjar, a spokesman for Eaglepointe and Sky Properties, said his firm depends on geotechnical experts — as required by Utah law.

"We hire experts to give us their best advice," he said of the 2013 report. "Obviously, if we had anticipated a problem, we would have done something to mitigate it."

The Salt Lake Tribune contacted seven active and retired geotechnical experts in the public and private sectors requesting a review and comparison of the 2003 and 2013 reports. None would go on the record. Some said they feared being caught up in a legal dispute.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.