Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Rick Egan | Tribune file photo) The Book Cliffs south of Vernal.
Deal protects land near Book Cliffs, allows other drilling
Reservation » Ute tribe to honor swap that protects Book Cliffs, boosts oil, gas holdings.
First Published Aug 20 2014 11:37 am • Last Updated Aug 21 2014 10:55 am

A long-awaited deal will protect remote southern reaches of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation from development and, at the same time, let the tribe and state partner on oil and gas ventures to the north.

While the arrangement was spearheaded by pro-drilling members of Utah’s congressional delegation, environmentalists found much to praise because the agreement safeguards parts of the scenic Book Cliffs inside the reservation from industrial development.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Ute tribal leaders plan a Wednesday commemoration of the Hill Creek Cultural Preservation and Energy Development Act, which President Barack Obama signed into law July 25 and which paves the way for the federal-state mineral swap.

The ceremony at Fort Duchesne will include a tour of the tribe’s Hill Creek Extension, the region of the reservation affected by the law.

"With this bill, we will be able to protect our most valuable resources while also promoting energy development," said Gordon Howell, who heads the tribe’s business committee.

The law enables the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) to give up mineral rights it holds in the Hill Creek’s southern end in Grand County, a roadless area the tribe intends to protect for its wildlife, scenery and spiritual significance.

In exchange for its claim to 18,000 checkerboard acres of minerals, SITLA will get access to an equal number of subsurface acres to the north on the Uintah County portion of the Hill Creek Extension.

"The southern parcels won’t be developed. As soon as the government receives them they will be held in trust for the tribe, which has designated that as a nondevelopment area," said Kent Hoffman, oil and gas chief for Bureau of Land Management’s Utah office, which administers the oil and gas deposits in play.

Next, federal and state agencies must agree where the state will gain mineral rights. The process of identifying those federal acres may take some time, although officials say it will be far less complicated than recent swaps that got mired for years in appraisals and negotiations.

"It’s not technically a land exchange, but an ‘in-lieu selection,’ " SITLA General Counsel John Andrews said. "It’s an authorization for us to relinquish our mineral estate in the south half and select minerals in the north half [of Hill Creek]."


story continues below
story continues below

Geologists working for SITLA and the tribe are identifying "the correct BLM minerals in the north part," Andrews said. "We are trying to identify the most prospective minerals."

The idea is for the tribe and SITLA to develop the oil and gas in a joint partnership with the private sector. The company would sell the resources, and royalties would be shared among the Utah schools trust fund, the tribe and the federal government.

"The federal government is getting the percentage it would get anyway [6.25 percent]," Andrews said. "In reality, they will get more because they weren’t able to access their minerals previously."

Every member of Utah’s congressional delegation supported the accord, which won nearly universal endorsements, including from The Wilderness Society.

"This legislation will help protect one of the most ecologically critical and culturally sensitive lands in the country," Paul Spitler, the group’s wilderness campaign director, said in a news release. "At the same time, it will increase revenue for the Utah schools and the tribe. It is a win for the environment, the tribe and the state."

Congress created the Hill Creek Extension in 1948, adding 510,000 acres to the Ute Tribe’s reservation. But the mineral rights remained in federal control with the subsurface resources of every ninth section — 39,000 acres total — belonging to Utah for the benefit of schools.

But the tribe’s wish to manage the southern end of its reservation, around the Book Cliffs, for natural and cultural values rendered SITLA’s mineral interest there largely inaccessible.

The agency asked for a swap in 2006, but the BLM declined, citing legal concerns. Looking for a solution, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, sponsored the law authorizing a trade.

bmaffly@sltrib.com



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.