Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Riverton faces lawsuit over rejection of plasma-donation clinic
Courts » Developers allege that the decision was illegal and politically motivated.
First Published Jul 30 2014 03:21 pm • Last Updated Aug 22 2014 06:31 pm

Behind closed doors Tuesday night, Riverton city officials discussed strategies for dealing with a lawsuit brought by a company denied its request to locate a plasma donation clinic in the southwest Salt Lake Valley municipality.

Developers behind the plan filed the complaint last week in 3rd District Court claiming rejection of the application to build a plasma-collection clinic was illegal and politically motivated.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The lawsuit was spurred by the City Council’s 3-1 vote earlier this month to reject the proposal from BioLife Plasma Services, a subsidiary of Baxter Healthcare Corp., to locate its clinic at 13503 South Hamilton Road (3600 W.) in Riverton.

The site is zoned commercial, and according to the city’s zoning requirements, can house "physicians, dental and other professional medical offices" and "medical clinics," according to the lawsuit.

The complaint claims the decision was "erroneous, arbitrary, capricious [and] illegal."

In February, when the proposal was discussed, several residents spoke against BioLife Plasma. They raised concerns that having a medical center close to their schools and homes would be dangerous.

An online petition started by residents currently has 67 signatures. It claims that a business paying for plasma will invite "loitering, increased crime, homeless people, drugs" and result in "lower home values."

The lawsuit alleges that the council’s denial, which was counter to city staffers’ determination that the clinic was a permitted use and the approval of the planning commission, resulted from "fear of public clamor."

Bruce Baird, BioLife Plasma’s attorney in the case, could not immediately be reached.

Jeff Hawker, spokesman for Riverton, said because the lawsuit has been filed, the city could not comment.


story continues below
story continues below



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.