Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
As Utah waits for same-sex ruling, marriage battle spreads
Courts » Support appears to be growing for same-sex marriage.


< Previous Page


The other four were filed in federal court.

"It’s very checkered," Tobias said.

At a glance

Where is same-sex marriage legal?

California

Connecticut

Delaware

Hawaii

Illinois

Iowa

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Minnesota

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

Rhode Island

Vermont

Washington

Washington, D.C.

States with cases pending in U.S. appeals courts

4th Circuit » Virginia

5th Circuit » Texas

6th Circuit » Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee

9th Circuit » Nevada

10th Circuit » Oklahoma, Utah

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

So what’s the advantage to fighting a case like these before a federal judge rather than a state one?

The answers can vary state-by-state, but generally, Tobais said, the consensus is federal judges are better equipped to rule on these questions of federal constitutionality.

Changing landscape » On Friday, Arkansas became the most recent state to see its ban on such unions overturned by a judge — state Circuit Court Judge Christopher Piazza declared that a state law and constitutional amendment that defined marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman are unconstitutional. At least one Arkansas county began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on Saturday as Attorney General Dustin McDaniel said he would appeal the ruling and ask that it be suspended during that process.

"The issue at hand is the fundamental right to marry being denied to an unpopular minority," Piazza wrote in his decision. "Arkansas’s marriage laws discriminate against same-sex couples in violation of the Equal Protection Clause because they do not advance any conceivable legitimate state interest."

The judge took a different approach than many federal judges have, and found that the state’s law was predicated on animus, or malevolent prejudice, against a particular group.

Piazza also liberally compared same-sex marriage bans to 20th-century laws that outlawed interracial marriages, which were ultimately struck down in the landmark 1967 case Loving v. Virginia.

It’s a comparison experts believe will be brought to the forefront on Tuesday, when Virginia appeals a lower court’s decision to topple their ban on same-sex marriages to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.


story continues below
story continues below

Virginia’s appeal, which trails Utah’s and Oklahoma’s by barely a month, is also likely to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court — regardless of the outcome.

What’s next » Although Utah, Virginia and Oklahoma are just a few of the several same-sex marriage cases likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court, the nation’s high court does not have to hear any of them.

Justices can decide which case — if any — they want to hear.

This has led to widespread speculation over which circuit may be selected.

Some experts argue the court may want to hear a case out of the 6th Circuit because it would be representative — each of its states has a same-sex marriage lawsuit pending.

Others argue it may select Utah’s case out of the 10th Circuit, given that Shelby’s ruling was the first and, arguably, most influential of the district-level decisions.

The court may also choose to lump all the cases together and issue a broad ruling.

No matter what they do, Tobias said, it’s unlikely the court will choose not to rule on the question given the amount of momentum such cases have gained and how widely they’ve spread.

"Judges read the newspaper and live in society and interact with other citizens," he said. "They have a sense of what’s going on and how much this matters to people. They have to."

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.