Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | Tribune file photo) Elder Donald Hallstrom, a member of the Presidency of the Seventy of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, gives the opening prayer in the House during the first day of the 2012 Utah Legislature. The Senate and House open each day of the session with an invocation.
Supreme Court prayer ruling not likely to impact many Utah cities

In a 1993 ruling, state Supreme Court found prayer in city council meetings constitutional.

First Published May 05 2014 01:55 pm • Last Updated May 06 2014 10:06 am

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling that local governments have broad discretion in opening meetings with prayer likely won’t have dramatic impact on city councils in Utah, which currently take a variety of approaches — from invocations to moments of silence to skipping prayer altogether.

Released Monday, the 5-4 decision found prayers were constitutional so long as they didn’t attempt to proselytize or criticize those of other faiths, or nonbelievers. The justices said the prayers could not involve coercion, but they did not spell out a requirement that local governments attempt to ensure diversity in the religious expression communicated.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The constitutionality of prayer in city council meetings was upheld in Utah in a 1993 ruling by the state Supreme Court.

But the Utah court set up a standard of "neutrality" aimed at ensuring that any faith, or group of non-believers, be given equal opportunity to express its views.

"Lutherans or Latter-day Saints who wish to use [government] facilities must have access on exactly the same terms as the Loyal Order of the Moose, the American Atheist Society, or the Libertarian Party," then-Utah Chief Justice Michael Zimmerman wrote for the majority in the 4-1 opinion.

Coercion » That strict adherence to neutrality is absent from the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which rejected the notion that a lack of diversity in the mostly Christian prayers of the Greece, N.Y., Town Council constituted an illegal government endorsement of prayer.

"The showing [of coercion or proselytizing] has not been made here, where the prayers neither chastised dissenters nor attempted lengthy disquisition on religious dogma," Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion. "In the general course, legislative bodies do not engage in impermissible coercion merely by exposing constituents to prayer they would rather not hear and in which they need not participate."

One remedy for those not wishing exposure, he suggested, was for them to leave the room. He also reasoned that because the prayers took place in a ceremonial opening part of the meeting, those stepping out would not miss out on the policy making actions of the government body.

A sampling of city councils by The Tribune last summer found wide diversity in the ways local governments handle the prayer issue.

story continues below
story continues below

Salt Lake City does not open its council meetings with any kind of prayer or moment of silence.

St. George, Provo, South Jordan and Bluffdale all opened with invocations. On the other hand, Bountiful, Draper, Heber City, Syracuse, Vernal and Taylorsville opened with an invocation, "thought," "comments," "uplifting thought," or "reverence." Ogden City began its council meetings with a moment of silence.

"I wouldn’t be surprised if there isn’t any change at all" in the wake of the ruling, said Kenneth Bullock, Utah League of Cities and Towns executive director.

"There’re options and it’s somewhat predicated on where each individual community is at — their preference," said Bullock. "I think there’s a growing sensitivity to the diversity of our communities and the need for inclusion of all different types of faiths."

Utah court fight » It was a lawsuit against Salt Lake City’s practice of opening council meetings with prayer that took the issue to the Utah Supreme Court a generation ago. But the council did not keep up the practice following its victory in the state high court.

Salt Lake City Council Chairman Charlie Luke says he has no plans to bring up the issue now as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

"Unfortunately, prayer [in government meetings] has become a political issue that divides more than it tends to unify," Luke said. "It can alienate people and that loses the whole purpose of what prayer is in my opinion."

He said the city’s policy is largely aimed at making sure that city residents "don’t feel excluded or put in a situation where they’re uncomfortable. It’s difficult enough to get people to participate in the public process."

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which claims membership of about 60 percent of the residents of Utah, hailed the court ruling.

"We applaud the U.S. Supreme Court upholding the long-standing practice of prayer within government meetings," spokesman Cody Craynor said in a statement. "We believe the ruling upholds the rich American tradition of religious participation in the public square."

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.