Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
The Salt Creek/Horse Canyon road in the Needles District of Canyonlands National Park flooded Oct. 5, 2011. Photo courtesy Canyonlands National Park
Utah, county lose again in dispute over Canyonlands path
Old dispute » San Juan County loses bid to prevent closure of what it calls a road.
First Published Apr 27 2014 01:01 am • Last Updated Apr 29 2014 12:36 pm

A federal appeals court has rejected a claim that a stretch of creek bed in Canyonlands National Park is a public highway and that San Juan County and Utah can prevent the federal government from closing it to vehicles.

The decision, issued late Friday by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, upholds the closure to motorized traffic of Salt Creek Road, an unimproved road that intertwines with the creek bed in the Salt Creek Canyon.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Environmental organizations applauded the decision. Stephen Bloch, of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, one of the groups that filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, said the ruling will protect a key part of the national park.

Salt Creek Road, which has been closed to vehicles since 1998, is the primary way for people to reach several scenic sites within the park, including Angel Arch. Without being able to drive, the only way to make the nine-mile trek to the arch is by foot or by pack animal.

After the National Park Service announced in 2004 that it planned to keep the road closed, San Juan County — later joined by the state of Utah — filed suit arguing that under Revised Statue (R.S.) 2477, the road was a public highway.

R.S. 2477, enacted by Congress in 1866, granted rights-of-way to construct highways over public lands. The law has been repealed but existing roads were grandfathered in . Under Utah law, a highway is created when a road is used "continuously and uninterruptedly " as a public thoroughfare for 10 years.

U.S. District Judge Bruce Jenkins in Salt Lake City ruled at the conclusion of a trial that started in 2009 that although the county and state had shown a variety of historical uses of the road, there was not enough evidence to prove continuous public use for a decade. That decision led to the appeal to 10th Circuit, which upheld Jenkins’ ruling.

pmanson@sltrib.com

Twitter: @PamelaMansonSLC




Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.