Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Paul Fraughton | Tribune file photo) In this photo from June, Selin Hoboy, left, and James Nold, representatives of Stericycle, explain the incineration process the company employs at its North Salt Lake facility to a group of citizens concerned over the possible health effects from the incinerator's emissions.
House OKs relocation of Stericycle medical waste incinerator

First Published Mar 03 2014 04:18 pm • Last Updated Mar 03 2014 08:24 pm

The Utah House passed legislation Monday clearing the path for Stericycle to move its medical waste incinerator from North Salt Lake to a new location in Tooele.

Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper, said the unanimous approval of HJR6 by the Utah House is just the first step in the process and doesn’t specify where the new incinerator would be located. The plan, now headed to the Senate, still must get regulatory approval and there is no hard time frame for the move.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Rep. Merrill Nelson, R-Grantsville, who represents the area in Tooele County where Stericycle may relocate, said he understands the concerns that opponents have about the health and air quality, but he supports the resolution allowing the move.

"I don’t have concerns about what’s being disposed of. This is medical waste we create when we go to the doctor’s office," said Nelson, adding it’s not nearly as toxic as nerve gas that the military has burned in the area.

Stericycle has been under pressure to move from local residents concerned about the health effects of the incinerator.

State regulators have issued a citation to Stericycle, alleging the smoke coming from Stericycle’s stack has exceeded limits for dioxin, furan and nitrous oxides. And the plant failed to report exceeding emissions and rigged a stack test, regulators say.

Stericycle has denied the violations and taken legal steps to fight those citations.

Rep. Douglas Sagers, R-Tooele, said he spent Saturday meeting with his constituents to discuss the proposed move. He said the incinerator would be located about 30 miles from any homes and he is comfortable with the plan.

He would not, Sagers said, risk exposing his children or grandchildren to anything that might be harmful. "No way I’d do that," he said.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.