Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Paul Fraughton | The Salt Lake Tribune) Chad Golsan, of Salt Lake City, goes through the steps to pay for parking at a parking kiosk on Main Street Wednesday, August 21, 2013. A lawsuit filed against the city claims city code wasn't changed to authorize procedural changes that came with the meters.
SLC mayor: Parking kiosks not to blame for revenue loss

Becker cites lack of personnel, dismissal of tickets among reasons for $1.5M shortfall.

First Published Mar 03 2014 02:48 pm • Last Updated Mar 03 2014 10:44 pm

A significant downturn in projected parking revenues apparently has little to do with the notion that many Salt Lakers — and others — simply detest the blue curbside parking kiosks downtown.

Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker’s office has forwarded to the City Council an analysis on why parking revenues are down about $1.5 million — the second year in a row.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

According to the PowerPoint presented to the council, revenues are off due to a high turnover rate of compliance officers, warnings in some cases issued rather than citations, dismissals of parking tickets for various reasons, lack of revenue-collection personnel, and, last but not least, kiosk overheating.

But man-on-the street sentiments reveal the meters are too dark to use at night, often don’t accept credit cards, and can be confusing. The fact that 18 months ago rates were raised from $1.50 to $2 an hour and enforcement hours extended from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. still sticks in the craw of many would-be curbside parkers.

Tom Alder, of Alderwood Fine Art, said it’s clear to him why revenues are down.

"I have never heard from a Salt Laker that they love the meters: more expensive, they charge until 8 p.m. and it’s hard for people to figure them out or even see the instructions in the evening."

The new kiosks were supposed to be good for business. But Alder believes otherwise.

"Our gallery used to be at 200 E. South Temple and we had loads of clients who tried to park at the meters on South Temple but couldn’t figure them out," he said. "We lost business as a result. We now are at 641 E. South Temple and there are no parking meters up here and we do have more visibility and signs for parking."

City Council Chairman Charlie Luke wouldn’t go so far as to brand the kiosks as Edsels — the expensive but unpopular sedan of the late 1950s — but he conceded he’s got an uneasy feeling about the $4.5 million system.

"Anytime you change anything, there will be resistance. This is different," he said. "Two years in, it’s a problem."


story continues below
story continues below

Luke said he would like to see data that determined whether motorists were switching over to private lots to avoid the blue kiosks.

One of the main reasons for the changeover from the old meters was to allow motorists to pay for parking with credit cards. But often the kiosks won’t accept them, Luke said.

"I’ve personally had several instances where the kiosks wouldn’t take any of my credit cards."

The city is stuck with the kiosks, Luke said of the seven-year bond to pay off the purchase of the system. But it should rethink its parking revenue projections and perhaps the "real objective of our parking policy. If it’s simply to collect revenue, let’s say so."

Councilman Kyle LaMalfa said he isn’t a big fan of the system but hoped the "kinks" can be worked out.

The parking policy should be aimed at helping downtown businesses, LaMalfa said, not simply raising revenue. He embraced the notion forwarded by the Downtown Alliance business group that sought extension of enforcement hours to free up spaces in front of restaurants during evening hours.

"It should be used to ensure business is successful," LaMalfa said. "We need turnover in parking and revenue is a side benefit."

The council will again take up the topic Tuesday at its regularly scheduled afternoon work session.

csmart@sltrib.com



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.