Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | The Salt Lake Tribune) Senator Curtis Bramble, bottom, testifies in the House Government Operation Standing Committee Monday March 3, 2014, on SB54, Elections Amendments. He was the sponsor of the bill. The amended bill passed unananimously in the committee to send it to the House floor. Many on the committee had reservations but voted for the so-called "Utah count my vote" compromise bill.
Count My Vote deal gets roughed up, but advances
Election reform » Lawmakers have many complaints, but advance bill in first test.
First Published Mar 03 2014 11:56 am • Last Updated Mar 03 2014 10:45 pm

Defenders of Utah’s caucus system for nominating candidates pummeled a deal struck over the weekend between legislators and organizers of the Count My Vote ballot initiative, calling it an unconstitutional affront to the First Amendment and comparing it to bloodshed in the streets of Kiev.

Former Rep. Chris Herrod said the fundamental issue is whether political parties have the freedom to associate without government interference — which he added is the same thing the world is witnessing in clashes in Ukraine.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"I believe in the First Amendment, and as you look at what’s happening around the world and you look at what’s happening in Russia and Ukraine as we speak, First Amendment rights are being taken away," Herrod said. "I feel the same thing is happening here."

SB54, sponsored by Sen. Curt Bramble, R-Provo, is the product of a compromise hammered out with leaders of the Count My Vote movement.

Count My Vote was gathering signatures for a ballot initiative that would have supplanted the existing system — in which nominees generally are chosen by delegates elected at neighborhood party caucuses — with a system of direct primaries.

Bramble’s bill leaves the caucus system in place, but provides an alternate path by letting candidates get on a party primary ballot by gathering a set number of signatures.

Count My Vote leaders have said they are willing to abandon their ballot initiative once the governor signs Bramble’s measure.

Bramble argues his bill is better than the Count My Vote plan. He says he’s not a gambler, but also believes the initiative will pass if his measure doesn’t.

"This is a pretty simple proposition: Do you want to preserve the caucus-convention system, then you vote for this bill," Bramble said. "If you want to risk that going away in its entirety, then you vote against this bill, place it all on black, and work either for or against the initiative."

On Monday, the House Government Operations Committee approved it unanimously, although several members warned it was unconstitutional, opposed by their constituents and that they may vote against it when it goes to the House floor.


story continues below
story continues below

"This kind of stinks. I don’t like this bill," said Rep. Keith Grover, R-Provo. "I think we should call [Count My Vote’s] bluff and really go for it and see what happens."

Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab, said the compromise language is bad for rural Utah and he objects to the process that led to its creation. He said he was particularly disappointed when former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney endorsed Count My Vote.

"I don’t know if I could be more hurt," Noel said.

The compromise language, he added, turns over control of the nominating process to people who get their information from advertisements. "To me, the scariest voter is the uninformed voter."

Rep. Dan McCay, R-Riverton, the bill’s House sponsor, said it’s clear that some lawmakers don’t think the bill strikes the right balance and anticipates considerable debate when it comes up for a floor vote, likely later this week.

Under the SB54 deal, a qualified party would have to allow unaffiliated voters to vote in its primaries, allow absentee voting for delegates at its conventions, and accept an alternative path to the ballot.

A candidate who chooses not to go through the party-convention gantlet could gather a number of signatures from registered voters and advance to the primary ballot.

Under the proposed framework, a candidate running for statewide office would need signatures from 28,000 voters to get on the primary ballot. A quarter of that number would be needed to run for one of the four congressional districts. State Senate candidates would need 2,000 signatures and House candidates would need half that number.

The signatures could come from any registered voter, regardless of party.

It was the signature target needed in county races — 3 percent of the registered voters — that concerned Rep. John Mathis, R-Vernal, who said that in a place such as Daggett County, a candidate would need only a dozen or so signatures to get on the ballot.

"Particularly for county sheriff, it’s a concern for me," Mathis said.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.