Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Senate panel advances restrictions on drone use
Drone rules » Legislation seeks to balance security, privacy concerns.
First Published Feb 25 2014 02:29 pm • Last Updated Feb 25 2014 08:26 pm

A Senate committee unanimously advanced legislation that would regulate drones used for surveillance by law enforcement agencies in Utah.

SB16702 would require law officers to obtain a warrant, except in cases where courts have said it is acceptable to proceed without one, to gather or use data collected by an unmanned aerial vehicle. The proposal, now headed for consideration in the full Senate, also stipulates when agencies can keep data gathered on a subject other than one specified as a surveillance target. Additionally, agencies would have to report their drone usage annually to the Department of Public Safety and post it on their websites.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Bill sponsoring Sen. Howard Stephenson said U.S. law enforcement is increasing the use of drones and the vehicles can be an important tool for law enforcement to protect citizens and officers. However, he believes protections need to be in place to protect citizens’ privacy.

"We believe that rules must be put in place to ensure that we can enjoy the benefits of this new technology without bringing us closer to a surveillance society," the Draper Republican said.

In 2013, 43 states considered legislation dealing with unmanned aerial vehicles mainly dealing with privacy issues, Stephenson said, adding that Utah should follow the example of nine states who passed laws. He argued it is important for states to enact restrictions because the courts are slow to catch up to technology in their interpretations of the Constitution.

Connor Boyack, president of the libertarian Libertas Institute, said the military has drones the size of mosquitoes and it is only a matter of time before similar technology is available to businesses and local governments. Privacy protections are important because people change their behavior and censor themselves when they know they are being watched.

He said drones are an acceptable tool as long as agencies have a warrant and are going after a specific person suspected of a crime.

"I think it is very wise to preemptively enact privacy protections consistent with the Fourth Amendment and probable cause and obtaining a warrant," Boyack said. "I don’t think that this is saying that law enforcement have used these and that there have been problems. I see this as a very proactive step."

Department of Public Safety Commissioner Keith Squires said drones can help to protect law enforcement officers and public safety. Unmanned aerial vehicles can help officers locate suspects in open areas and the state has used remote controlled helicopters to photograph traffic accidents to help reopen highways.


story continues below
story continues below

"There are such great applications for this technology, but in my position I also consider myself and my responsibilities to be a careful steward of our Fourth Amendment rights and so I appreciate this legislation and the guidelines it provides," Squires said.

Stephenson said his bill does not intend to impede the state from developing or investing in beneficial drone use such as commercial or research and development, but to put restrictions on law enforcement. He said the Governor’s Office of Economic Development asked him to include language, which may be added later, ensuring that the state wants the economic benefits from drone research and manufacturing.

"We see that as a positive thing because of the wonderful things that can be done to protect our citizens and our law enforcement officers," Stephenson said.

Marina Lowe, legislative and policy counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah said the proposal will make drone development in the state easier and prevent occurrences such as a proposed ordinance in Deer Trail, Colo., that would allow residents to buy a license to hunt drones.

"I think this kind of legislation on the state level will reassure citizens that their privacy is being protected and that they don’t need to take matters into their own hands or be fearful if they see a drone engaged in legitimate activity," Lowe said.

Email: twebb@sltrib.com

Twitter: @topherjwebb



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.