Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
No vote on Utah conflict of interest bill thanks to rule technicality
Ethics » Sponsor claims unfair treatment on bill that would allow lawmakers to abstain.
First Published Feb 24 2014 03:46 pm • Last Updated Feb 25 2014 07:27 am

The House Rules committee found a way Monday to skip a tough vote on legislation that, paradoxically, leaders say could allow too many members to skip other tough votes. It was a move that infuriated one ethics-reform minded legislator.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Currently, Utah and Oregon are the only states that require legislators to vote — with no option to abstain — even if they have a major conflict of interest. HR2 would allow abstaining.

Ethics-reform groups say that would likely lead to better disclosure of conflicts of interest and more ethical behavior. But leaders see conflicts as natural in a citizen legislature where everyone has other jobs, and worry that creating more pressure to declare conflicts and skip votes could get out of hand.

The committee avoided voting on HR2 Monday by saying House rules ban it from voting after the full House is scheduled to convene. It made that ruling at 2:10 p.m., ten minutes after the House was scheduled to convene at 2 p.m. But the House did not actually begin until 12 minutes later.

"This isn’t fair," Rep. Jim Nielson, R-Bountiful, the sponsor of HR2, complained to Rules Committee Chairman Dean Sanpei, R-Provo. He noted the committee did not begin its meeting until 1:30 p.m., then heard four other bills before allowing him to speak just a couple minutes before 2.

Sanpei told Nielson he was unsure if the committee would hold another public hearing, and not certain it would vote on HR2. Nielson said if the committee does not take another vote, he will ask for a vote of the full House to pull the bill from the committee directly to the House floor for action.

"But it may not pass even if that succeeds," Nielson said. "People depend on work of committees to guide them."

The Tribune on Monday published a story examining conflicts in the Utah Legislature — including finding that one of every five bills this year is sponsored by lawmakers who have conflicts, or specialized experience, because of their regular jobs.

"This is an ethics bill. It is important and deserves to be heard on the floor," Nielson said.

story continues below
story continues below

The committee also voted 6-3 to approve SJR7 by Rep. Ken Ivory, R-West Jordan, to alter "constitutional notes" placed on bills when legislative analysts worry they may be unconstitutional. It would allow additional notes to advise on whether and how the bill could help Utah in its fight to protect the rights of states against the federal government.In other action, the committee unanimously endorsed a rules change to ban fundraising on the House floor. House Democratic Leader Jennifer Seelig, D-Salt Lake City, said last year some members started distributing flyers inviting members to fundraising events — which she said is inappropriate.Nielson said lawmakers can avoid tough votes now "by taking a walk" out of the chamber. "But that isn’t transparent," and people don’t know if they left for a legitimate reason or were simply fleeing.Rep. Brian King, D-Salt Lake City, said abstentions might allow more lawmakers to avoid tough votes, and perhaps make it tough to find majorities needed in those cases — a view stated by leaders in previous years.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.