Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(| Tribune file photo) Sen. Curt Bramble, R-Provo, is in line to take the helm of the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Hard-fought Utah immigration laws may be repealed

First Published Feb 24 2014 11:34 am • Last Updated Mar 02 2014 11:05 pm

Sen. Curt Bramble signaled Monday that two bills at the heart of rancorous immigration debates three years ago — but had their effective dates delayed for years — may be repealed outright soon if the federal government does not provide waivers to operate them.

One of those laws would create a state program to allow undocumented immigrants now in Utah to obtain a guest-worker permit — and stay in the state — by paying a fine, submitting to a background check and showing proficiency in English.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The other is a temporary pilot program that would allow any U.S. citizen who is a Utah resident to sponsor an undocumented immigrant not already in the state to live and work here — but those immigrants could not leave Utah.

Bramble, R-Provo, is sponsoring SB203 to delay the implementation dates of those laws until 2017 instead of the currently scheduled 2015. The Senate Business and Labor Committee passed it Monday 4-0 and sent it to the full Senate.

Bramble noted the earlier-passed laws likely need waivers in federal law to work, which he said are unlikely to come. So, he said, "If we don’t get a waiver, I’m going to recommend, before that [2017] date, that those bills be repealed."

He explained, "The purpose of the whole immigration debate [three years ago] was to send a message to Congress that it is possible to find a rational, reasonable solution." He said that was accomplished ­— and showed what a state-only program could look like if a federal waiver were granted.

He said it is worth seeing whether current talk about immigration reform in Congress could bring reform soon, and, if not, to repeal the laws before 2017.

Jean Hill, representing the Catholic Diocese of Salt Lake City, testified in support of both the extension of the effective dates and possibly repealing the laws. She said it is confusing to many to have those laws on the books but not yet in effect — and it confuses them about what is legally possible.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.