Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Proposal to shift gas tax rejected
Hurt the poor? » Would have lowered gas tax but raised sales tax to raise funds for roads.
First Published Feb 21 2014 05:20 pm • Last Updated Feb 24 2014 06:02 pm

Amid arguments that it would "pave under the poor," a House committee rejected a proposal Friday that would have lowered the state gasoline tax in exchange for higher sales tax to raise more funds overall for transportation.

HB135 failed on a 3-5 vote in the House Transportation Committee.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"We are asking people to pay with their food tax for those who use the roads whether or not they have automobiles," said Steve Erickson, representing the Crossroads Urban Center, which operates a food pantry for the poor.

"This bill is another attempt to pave under the poor," said Linda Hilton, director of the Coalition of Religious Communities, which advocates for the poor. "Just go ahead and raise the gas tax. Please don’t lower it and put it on the backs of the poor."

But committee chairman Johnny Anderson, R-Taylorsville, sponsor of the bill said everybody benefits from transportation whether they have a car or not. He said the bill would solve some of the problems with the current gas tax, which has not been raised since 1997.

He said that tax has lost 40 percent of its buying power since then from inflation and because of more fuel-efficient cars.

Studies estimate an $11.3 billion shortfall through 2040 for high-priority transportation projects if the tax structure is not changed. Supporters of the bill estimated it could make up roughly $1.5 billion of that shortfall.

Anderson’s bill would cut the current gasoline tax from 24.5 cents to 12.2 cents. It would replace lost revenue for transportation by hiking the state’s share of general sales tax from 4.7 percent to 4.96 percent, and from 1.75 percent to 2.01 percent on food.

The new sales tax for transportation would tend to raise more revenue automatically with inflation. Meanwhile, the bill would have required the remaining gas tax to be adjusted each year to match the rate of rising road-maintenance costs.

But committee members said they were uncomfortable shifting what has been a user fee to a more general tax.

story continues below
story continues below

Rep. Val Peterson, R-Orem, said, "I am concerned about it moving away from a use tax…. We need to continue to find a good solution for that."

Meanwhile, another gasoline tax hike is advancing, and has been approved by a Senate committee. SB60 by Sen. John Valentine, R-Orem, would recalculate the gas tax annually. It is written to stay the same for the first year, but then would increase with the price of gasoline — but not fall below current levels.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.