Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Tribune file photo) Utah Gov. Gary Herbert
Utah House leaders to punt on federal Medicaid money
Health » GOP leaders say low-income Utahns can be covered without accepting $524M from the feds.
First Published Feb 18 2014 06:50 pm • Last Updated Feb 24 2014 10:36 am

House Republican leaders unveiled a stripped-down proposal for covering uninsured Utahns, forgoing about $524 million in federal Medicaid expansion dollars and instead creating a narrow, state-run program to cover parents below the poverty line or those with serious medical conditions.

House Speaker Becky Lockhart, R-Provo, said legislators have been given a "false choice," between taking hundreds of millions of federal dollars or doing nothing.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"What we’re trying to propose through this state-based [alternative] is another option," said Lockhart. "It’s not just a political point. It’s a fiscally responsible point. … We are trying to be fiscally responsible in the state of Utah. We’re trying to avoid getting more and more attached to an unsustainable revenue source coming out at the federal level."

The goal of the plan is to facilitate coverage for some portion of the 54,000 Utahns, mostly single adults, below the poverty line — $11,670 for an individual, $23,850 for a family of four — who are currently not eligible for Medicaid.

The state would set aside between $30 million and $35 million to either subsidize the purchase of insurance or to defray health costs through a sort of flexible spending plan, with the medically frail or parents of children getting top priority.

It’s unclear how many people the proposal would be able to cover. Rep. Dean Sanpei, R-Provo, said it is possible the state will be able to give all of those below poverty some level of benefits, but not full Medicaid coverage.

Those who are above the poverty line would be eligible for federal subsidies to purchase health care that, in some instances, would cover nearly the entire cost of the policy.

In the process, Utah would pass up about $524 million each year in federal dollars that could flow to the state if it were to adopt full Medicaid expansion, according to figures prepared by legislative attorneys.

Tax money » "That’s money that we as taxpayers are paying in federal taxes and won’t get back. Now they’re looking to layer on a state tax," said Kristy Chambers, CEO of Fourth Street Clinic, which serves Utah’s homeless population.


story continues below
story continues below

"This is more money to serve fewer people."

Only about 20 percent of Fourth Street’s patients now qualify for Medicaid; under the expansion 80 percent would, said Chambers. The clinic doesn’t bill private insurance and would have to "gear up" under the House plan to do that.

Utah hospitals share lawmakers’ concerns about the Affordable Care Act’s price tag, which they’re helping to pay with $1.5 billion in Medicare payment cuts over 10 years.

But those cuts are already happening — yet more money lost if Utah doesn’t expand Medicaid, said David Entwistle, CEO of University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics.

Hospitals favor an Arkansas-style alternative that would allow Utah to draw its share of federal funding while using it to buy private insurance for impoverished Utahns.

"The more we can support private insurance, the better off we’ll be. We still struggle to get a lot of patients to sign up for Medicaid. It’s also problematic in terms of what it covers," he said.

Low-income advocates say the House plan doesn’t pencil out.

"With so few dollars available, two things will happen. We’ll cover fewer people and we’re going to have to provide them with a leaner benefit," said Lincoln Nehring, health policy analyst at Voices for Utah Children.

Spread across 54,000 Utahns, $35 million equates to $650 per person. That’s less than a third of  what a 35-year-old in Salt Lake City pays for the cheapest bronze-level plan on the federal insurance marketplace, HealthCare.gov — which carries a $6,000 deductible.

"We’re talking about individuals in poverty here with few resources," Nehring said. "We’re not offering them health coverage. We’re basically offering them an earned income tax credit."

Laura Polacheck, associate state director of AARP, said the group believes that it is "necessary to cover all adults under 100% of the federal poverty level under Medicaid. A state-run plan can’t make that promise."

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.