Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Report: School technology price tag as much as $750 million
Education » Advisory panel says cost of plan is more than double Lockhart’s estimate.
First Published Feb 13 2014 06:00 pm • Last Updated Feb 26 2014 02:15 pm

House Speaker Becky Lockhart unveiled details of her plan to invest as much as $300 million for technology in schools Thursday, but a soon-to-be released report suggests the price tag to put devices in every Utah student’s hands might actually be much steeper.

A draft of the report, from a work group associated with the Governor’s Education Excellence Commission, pegs the cost of one-to-one devices in Utah schools at as much as $750 million for the first year and $300 million a year after that. The report is set to be formally released in early March.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"The governor is supportive of technology in schools," said Tami Pyfer, the governor’s education adviser, on Thursday. "... Again it’s how to manage the amount of funds it will take to get us to a to a one-to-one ratio in the schools, and is that doable given the budget constraints we have at this time?"

She said the governor’s top priorities remain boosting per-pupil spending by 2.5 percent and funding enrollment growth.

"Those are things he doesn’t want to sacrifice," she said.

According to the draft report obtained by The Tribune, expenses would include at least one full-time technology specialist at every school at about $90 million a year; regular replacement of devices at $55 million a year; and teacher training at $105 million initially and $40 million a year after that.

Lockhart, however, said Thursday she doesn’t anticipate the cost being nearly so high. Lockhart said she had seen the study and believes there are redundancies and inefficiencies in the report.

It includes items she said can be streamlined by drawing on private providers and taking the program statewide.

"This is a number [$300 million] that we are very comfortable with," Lockhart said.


story continues below
story continues below

Package deal » The speaker envisions private-sector tech companies combining resources and putting together bids to offer entire packages — teacher training, hardware and software — that would be reviewed and certified by a state advisory board.

The board would be made up of members from the software and hardware industries, state school board, Utah Education Network, the STEM Action Center and two members from public education. The board would establish criteria and hire a consultant to create a master plan for the state’s technology education.

"We’re not reinventing the wheel here. We’re not having state government create computer programs," she said. "These are all things available on the market … by private providers, entities that will come together and partner with our schools."

Regardless of the exact price, the question of exactly how to pay for Lockhart’s ambitious legacy project remains unanswered.

"Let’s try not to be so focused on the money," Lockhart told members of the Republican House caucus Thursday afternoon. "If this is the vision we want to have for education, if this is where we know we’re headed … then we’ll find the money."

Lockhart said she is looking everywhere in Utah’s state budget, from education to transportation, but doesn’t see an appetite for a tax increase to pay for the proposal. One possible source of funds might be savings in the $35 million spent annually in Utah schools for traditional textbooks that could be shifted to digital upgrades.

Lockhart and Rep. Francis Gibson, R-Mapleton, who is sponsoring the bill creating the project, said they are looking for $50 million to upgrade the wireless "backbone" in Utah schools, equipping them to handle the technology.

The roughly $250 million remaining will go to training teachers and buying devices and software.

Even if lawmakers appropriate the money this year, schools likely won’t start seeing the impact until possibly the 2015-16 school year.

"We don’t want anyone to get the idea that next fall every child is going to have a device," Lockhart said. "That would be doing it wrong. That would be doing it backwards."

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.