Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | The Salt Lake Tribune) Dr. Brian Moench of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment speaks at press conference-rally with mothers and children who live near the Stericycle Meidical Incinerator in front of the Utah governor's office at the Capitol Thursday February 13, 2014.
Stericycle critics rally at Utah guv’s office
Pollution » Opponents say moving Stericycle doesn’t solve problem, just shifts it elsewhere.
First Published Feb 13 2014 01:31 pm • Last Updated Feb 14 2014 06:36 pm

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert has agreed to meet this month with activists and concerned residents who are agitating to close medical waste incinerator Stericycle.

The group rallied outside the governor’s office Thursday, asking the state to fine Stericycle, shut it down and reject its proposal to move to state lands in Tooele County.

Photos

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"We’ve said from the beginning that we don’t want to give our problems to somebody else," said Alicia Connell, a resident of the North Salt Lake neighborhood that abuts the Stericycle property. "Incineration is old, outdated and simply unnecessary since there are several alternative technologies that can process waste with zero emissions."

Companies marketing those technologies were also at the Capitol Thursday shopping around for a lawmaker to sponsor legislation to incentivize area hospitals and businesses to switch to "greener" waste-disposal systems.

Dwight Morgan, CEO of Sterimed, said his company is in talks with the University of Utah’s hospital and clinics, which contract with Stericycle to dispose of some of their chemotherapy waste but sought bids from competitors.

Utah should stop caving in to Stericycle and start encouraging adoption of newer, cleaner technologies, said protester Natasha Hincks, who lives near the incinerator. "This is a company that was caught over-polluting by up to 40 percent, manipulating their records and is currently under federal investigation. Stericycle shouldn’t be rewarded for their bad behavior."

Herbert ordered a multi-faceted investigation into possible health impacts associated with the Stericycle incinerator after the state Division of Air Quality alleged the incinerator’s emissions breached its permitted limits. The Illinois-based company is contesting the state’s notice of violation.

Public health officials found elevated rates of some types of cancer in the communities surrounding the incinerator, but could not link the cancer to environmental exposures.

"These cancers are all highly preventable through lifestyle choices and regular health screenings," explained one of the report’s authors.

Protesters objected to that statement, spotlighting three cases of childhood leukemia in the neighborhood. "To say you can avoid these types of cancer by being a non-smoker, by living a healthy lifestyle, and by avoiding sun exposure is insane," said Connell, holding photos of the children with shaven heads undergoing chemotherapy.


story continues below
story continues below

Clean-air advocate Brian Moench with Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment doesn’t question the motives behind the study, but disagrees with its conclusions.

Air pollution — specifically toxins emitted by Stericycle, including Dioxin and lead — is a known carcinogen, he said.

"Most solid cancers take decades to develop and Stericycle has only been in operation for about 24 years and neighborhoods were not built nearby until about 10 years ago," he said, noting any short-term cancer study would be incomplete and inconclusive.

Nevertheless, investigators did find elevated cancer risk, even among a population that, according to the study, had fewer lifestyle-associated risks than the rest of the state, Moench said. "Their rate of smoking was 50 percent less, and with that alone one would have expected lower cancer rates in that group, but that certainly wasn’t what was found."



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.