Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Francisco Kjolseth | Tribune file photo) The pollution-plagued Salt Lake Valley is obscured by another red air day as the inversion continues on Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2014.
Bill allowing tougher air standards in Utah barely advances
Air quality » Industry opposes SB164; says it won’t ‘have any benefit.’
First Published Feb 11 2014 05:16 pm • Last Updated Feb 11 2014 11:14 pm

A Senate committee on Tuesday narrowly advanced a bill that would enable state regulators to adopt air-quality standards that are tougher than federal thresholds.

Sponsored by Sen. Gene Davis, D-Salt Lake City, SB164 would repeal a 1989 statute that limits the authority of the Utah Division of Air Quality when it comes to enforcing the federal Clean Air Act.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The 1989 law allows the state to go beyond federal standards only after the DAQ makes a written determination that such standards are "not adequate to protect public health and the environment of the state."

This burden is so onerous that the process is rarely, if ever, used, according to the bill’s supporters, which include Gov. Gary Herbert.

"Is it going to be industry that is wagging the tail or will we have the flexibility to look at the standards and see if they make sense?" said Sen. Jim Dabakis, D-Salt Lake City. "The checks and balances are in place so that no one can run wild, even a renegade governor if we ever have one."

Industry representatives argued strongly against Davis’ bill, which the Senate Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment Committee endorsed in a 3-2 vote.

"We don’t want to see more stringent rules that cost a lot of money and don’t have any benefit," James Holtkamp, an attorney for the Utah Manufacturers Association, told the committee last week. "The manufacturers have been asked to do more than the standards require. The bull’s eye is on our back."

Rep. Rebecca Edwards, R-North Salt Lake, has introduced a competing measure in the House. HB121 would require the Air Quality Board to hold a public hearing before enacting tougher rules. That hearing must find that "the more stringent rule will provide essential added protections to public health or the environment of the state or a particular region of the state."

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.