Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Chris Detrick | Tribune file photo) Senate President Wayne Niederhauser
Senate president defends his ‘good friend’ ex-A.G. John Swallow
First Published Feb 01 2014 03:21 pm • Last Updated Feb 03 2014 09:23 am

Despite a yearlong scandal that had forced John Swallow from office, Senate President Wayne Niederhauser recently called the former attorney general a good friend and questioned the House’s investigation.

Niederhauser, R-Sandy, sent the email to a constituent in mid-December, about a week before House investigators presented their findings in which they alleged Swallow destroyed and fabricated evidence to cover his dealings and engaged in a pattern of pay-to-play favors.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

A month earlier, Swallow had announced his resignation, on the eve of the release of a report by the lieutenant governor’s office that found he had committed five election-law violations.

But Niederhauser’s constituent was upset at the witch hunt she felt the news media and the House had conducted against Swallow, calling it a waste of time and money.

"I know John very well. He is a good friend of mine," Niederhauser wrote. "I don’t believe the Senate would have taken the same track as the House. The House investigation is almost over. They are finishing up a report that will be made public. It will become quite clear at that point the value of the investigation. Thanks for your continued support of John through a very tough time."

On Friday, Niederhauser said Swallow remains a friend, although he didn’t speak to him for nearly nine months during the scandal, in case he had to preside over impeachment proceedings.

"I also see the value and support the House investigation. I think the outcomes there have been profound," Niederhauser said. "I voted for the investigation in July and supported the funding for that."

Niederhauser said many senators had felt that, instead of creating an investigative committee, the House should have gone straight to an impeachment process.

"The outcomes would have been the same," he said. "There was complete alignment how there needed to be a legislative investigative process."

Niederhauser said the regulation of "dark money" — funds that funnel through nonprofits to avoid disclosure of who contributed to candidates — looms as one of the biggest issues to come out of the investigation, and regulating it will be a challenge for lawmakers this session.

story continues below
story continues below

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.