Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Francisco Kjolseth | Tribune file photo) House Speaker Becky Lockhart has proposed a massive education technology initiative that is now at the center of a budget stalemate. The Senate's budget chairman says he fears the session ending without a budget for the first time in some 30 years.
Questions abound about how to pay for Speaker’s massive education push

$200M-$300M push by Lockhart would require big cuts in other state programs.

First Published Jan 31 2014 07:20 pm • Last Updated Jan 31 2014 10:10 pm

House Speaker Becky Lockhart is pitching an aggressive expansion of digital learning, but some in the Legislature and the education community are unsure about the massive price tag for her proposal and how to make the arithmetic add up.

Lockhart envisions spending between $200 million and $300 million to dramatically expand technological learning in schools, including buying tens of thousands of devices, training teachers on using technology in their lesson plans and building the wireless networks needed to support the tools.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

To pay for the project, Lockhart acknowledges she would have to look at possible reductions to every other area of state government.

"Everything is on the table. There are no sacred cows. This is a transformational idea and we have to have a serious discussion about it," the speaker said.

Sharon Gallagher-Fishbaugh, president of the Utah Education Association, said she’s happy to hear talk of spending money on education, but pouring money into technology is not the best use of the funds.

Currently, Utah spends nearly 10 percent less per pupil than it did before the recession, she said. Teachers haven’t received a cost-of-living adjustment or raise in years, and teacher training has fallen behind.

"I think we need to have a real serious look at getting back to pre-recession levels before we talk about having a massive $300 million investment in technology," Gallagher-Fishbaugh said. "While it sounds wonderful, we have big issues we need to tackle in a significant way."

Rep. Brad Last, R-St. George, who is the co-chair of the education budget committee, said he’s not sure where $200 million or more will come from.

"I guess [Lockhart’s] been working on it and I think she’s identified some sources of revenue, but I don’t know what they are," he said. "We already had a $50 million request from the State Office of Education [for technology] and there was quite a bit of concern about how we might be able to do that, so if we are to go significantly up from there, I’m not sure where it would come from."

David Crandall, acting chairman of the Utah State Board of Education, said he is waiting to hear more details of Lockhart’s plan, but "the numbers I’m hearing thrown around are pretty aggressive."

story continues below
story continues below

The board asked for $50 million to expand technology education, but it was just one of the priorities — with paying for new students attending school next year being a top priority and an increase in the per-pupil spending second. So Crandall said he wants to see how the money would be spread around.

"It’s always a concern," said Crandall. "Eventually you run out of money so you run out of what you can fund. So if you’re funding things at the top of the list, things are going to fall off the bottom."

Sen. Howard Stephenson, R-Draper, the other co-chair of the education budget committee, said the funding level is "ambitious" and may be more than schools can handle. Sometimes, he said, it is better to phase in technology programs over time.

"And I think [Lockhart’s] open to that, to scaling it over a few years rather than doing it in one fell swoop," Stephenson said. "We just need to do this carefully because we can flood the schools with devices and not make a significant difference."

Lockhart said Friday that she envisions the program being implemented over 18 months to two years, but it’s unfair to today’s students to make them wait. "Let’s get it done now if we can," she said.

Senate President Wayne Niederhauser, R-Sandy, said he doesn’t know a lot of details about Lockhart’s plan, but acknowledged the cost is an issue.

The Legislature has a total of about $338 million extra revenue to spend this year.

"Obviously we would have some questions about, are we going to use up all the money on this initiative? What about growth and what about [per pupil spending]?" he asked. "So those are questions that will need to be asked along the process."

"Not to mention things like state prisons and transportation," added Sen. Jerry Stevenson, R-Layton, vice-chairman of the budget committee.

In his budget proposal in December, Gov. Gary Herbert recommended a significant amount of new money going to education, but spread it across a variety of programs. He proposed $61.6 million to increase the per-pupil spending by about $100 each, $64 million to cover more than 10,000 new students entering public schools next year, and $7.5 million for all-day kindergarten programs.

Funding Lockhart’s education technology effort, plus the governor’s education programs, not to mention other demands on state government — such as employee raises, prison-population growth, increased costs for health care and other needs — would require deep cuts to other programs around the state.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.