Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Energy industry appeals Utah BLM decision on oil, gas leases
Oil and gas » Trade group says rock-art association wielded undue influence with BLM.
First Published Jan 14 2014 12:09 pm • Last Updated Jan 14 2014 10:22 pm

An energy industry group is accusing the Bureau of Land Management of bending to "one special interest" in its 11th-hour decision last fall to pull parcels in and around Utah’s scenic San Rafael Swell from an oil and gas lease sale.

The Western Energy Alliance filed an appeal of the decision with the Interior Board of Land Appeals on Monday.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Five days before the Nov. 19 auction, BLM’s Utah Director Juan Palma pulled 57 parcels, citing the need to conduct further study on the area’s cultural resources and sensitive species before committing the lands to energy development.

Conservationists, outdoor enthusiasts and historic preservationists applauded the move, which forestalls potential drilling in one of Utah’s most cherished landscapes. The state’s congressional delegation blasted it as a damper on interest in Utah’s energy resources.

The alliance’s appeal argues Palma ignored his office’s environmental review and deviated from accepted norms and leasing procedures, amounting to "the arbitrary and improper assertion of agency discretion."

The group alleges BLM’s last-minute about-face stemmed from a closed-door plea the Utah Rock Art Research Association made on Oct. 23, long after the environmental review for the lease sale was completed.

"BLM’s own policies state that it won’t accept comments received after established deadlines, yet ignored the public and its own carefully crafted measures by bending to the demands of one group," said Kathleen Sgamma, the alliance’s vice president of government and public affairs.

"The situation raises serious questions about political favoritism and sows further uncertainty in the federal leasing process," Sgamma said.

It is appropriate to table a decision when new information surfaces, BLM’s defenders shot back. Palma and his top staff reconsidered the leases after learning of 100 rock art sites that don’t appear on official inventories, according to Diane Orr, who chairs the rock art association’s preservation committee.

"It was numerous panels from four or five distinct cultures," Orr said. "They never have done the research and inventory. How can they plan roads? The topography has all these canyons. If you took a truck through you would destroy everything."


story continues below
story continues below

Orr acknowledged that her group failed to comment during BLM’s environmental review.

"We are a volunteer staff. We are stretched thin. I wish we had paid staff that could alert us to these things," she said. "Our goal is to educate Utahns and preserve this resource. This isn’t like seeking special privilege. We don’t have any financial stake in this."

The BLM declined to discuss the appeal for legal reasons.

In an email, Palma said: "The combination of thorough environmental analysis and public participation helps us ensure that energy resources on Utah’s public lands are responsibly developed in the right places and in the right ways."

For its May 20 auction, BLM is fielding public comment until Jan. 27 on oil and gas leases covering 132,052 acres on 111 parcels across southern Utah.

Joining the San Rafael appeal filed Monday is Castle Valley Holdings, a Denver-based company that nominated 10 of the parcels pulled from the auction. This firm and other alliance members say they spent $500,000 preparing for the auction.

"In an industry as risk-laden and capital intensive as oil and gas development, investment certainty requires the consistent interpretation and application of federal statutes, regulations and BLM policy governing lease acquisition," the appeal states.

The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, which had protested the San Rafael auction, vowed to intervene on BLM’s side and defend leasing reform, which it characterizes as "think first, and lease later."

"Once BLM makes a tentative decision, it has to offer those leases no matter what? Here there are cultural sites that could be destroyed, but it’s bound to offer those? That’s not right," said SUWA legal director Steve Bloch. "It is without question that BLM retains ultimate authority to offer any particular tract at a lease sale."

The Price Resource Management Plan, a Bush-era document guiding use of federal lands in Emery and Carbon counties, indicates all parcels proposed for the Nov. 19 auction are available for leasing, according to Sgamma.

BLM had taken SUWA and the Hopi Tribe’s input into consideration by attaching special stipulations to these parcels to protect rock art and other cultural resources, she said.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.