Washington » Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, came under bipartisan fire on Thursday for delaying a vote on a budget measure to keep the government running past Monday, with fellow senators wondering if Lee and tea party buddy Ted Cruz, R-Texas, were putting their own publicity ahead of the country.
Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., tried to distance fellow Republicans from Lee and Cruz, arguing the duo was simply grandstanding by pressing for a key vote to take place Friday when more conservative activists would be watching.
"The reason you don’t want to send a bill over to the House ... is that you want the American people and the outside groups you’ve been in contact with to be able to watch us tomorrow," Corker said on the Senate floor. "Is it more important for the senator from Texas and the senator from Utah that people from across the country watch this vote or is it more important to us that we have a good policy outcome from our standpoint?"
Rather than respond, Lee yielded to Cruz.
All it takes is one senator to object to delay a vote and Lee did that. Because of his objection, a technical vote on a stopgap funding measure — that also cuts all money for the Affordable Care Act — will take place Friday afternoon instead of Thursday night.
The stalling tactic brought a strong rebuke.
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said Lee’s move increased the chance of a government shutdown and that would hurt — among others — active military soldiers who would go without pay if that happens.
"They’ll be paid but their paychecks will be delayed," Durbin said. "But what it means is they’ll have to contact their wives and spouses back home, come Tuesday if this Cruz and Lee delay continues, they’ll have to contact them and say, ‘Honey, it’ll be a little difficult this pay period. It doesn’t look like we’ll be getting a paycheck because Congress has shutdown the government.’ "
"Why do these two senators — these two senators — believe this is in the best interest of America?" Durbin asked.
"Stand their ground" » Cruz and Lee had previously urged their House colleagues to pass the temporary budget resolution that halts any cash for implementing Obamacare. House Republicans followed through but Senate Republicans don’t have the votes to stop Democrats from restoring the funding so Lee and Cruz have been trying to block action on the bill they support.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the one-day delay engineered by Lee a "big, big charade" that could endanger Congress’ ability to get a bill passed by deadline.
Later, Lee’s spokesman Brian Phillips disputed suggestions that the timing drama is about publicity.
"The implication that this is about any one senator is absurd," Phillips said. "It’s a lazy personal attack and totally baseless."
Rather, the delay is needed to translate to the public what is going on under the complex rules of Congress, he said.
"The American people are tired of the games that hide the true meaning of these votes. And so we’re forced to explain it to them as best we can, and that takes time."
Cruz told a group of reporters and bloggers on a conference call earlier Thursday that the House should continue to fight to end funding for Obamacare if, as expected, Senate Democrats restore that money .
"House Republicans can, and I believe should, continue to stand their ground," Cruz said. "If the House holds firm, Harry Reid has no ability to muscle the House of Representatives — if they stand their ground."
House Republican leaders appear to have moved to a different tactic and are already working on a counter offer on the budget that doesn’t end funding for the health care law. Some members didn’t appreciate Cruz’s suggestion.
"Get out of this mess" » "The game is not over in the Senate. Go fight those fights," said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah. "We’ll do the right thing in the House."Next Page >
Copyright 2013 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.