Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Expert calls proposed Utah nuclear power plant a ‘non-starter’
Trial » Energy analyst says Blue Castle lacks financing, market for proposed Utah project.
First Published Sep 26 2013 02:13 pm • Last Updated Nov 20 2013 05:10 pm

Lacking sufficient financing and a real market, Blue Castle Holdings has no hope of developing a nuclear power plant in Utah, according to an energy analyst who testified Thursday in a trial over the project’s water rights.

"You can’t sell 14-cent power in a market where power costs 8 or 10 cents [per kilowatt-hour]. That’s why the nuclear renaissance has collapsed. If you can’t compete, you can’t raise money to build these projects," said Mark Cooper in an interview, echoing his testimony in Price’s 7th District Court.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Cooper’s remarks on the fourth and last day of witness testimony came in stark contrast to the words of Blue Castle executives and experts who extolled the virtues of nuclear energy and affirmed its bright future as a U.S. power source.

The week-long trial before Judge George Harmond focuses on whether the state appropriately assigned 53,000 acre feet of water to the Blue Castle project. Closing arguments are scheduled Friday, but Harmond is not expected to rule right away.

The suit, brought by Utah environmental groups and local water users, attacks the only issue in the nuclear controversy where the state exercises control. Should Blue Castle secure the right to suck enough water out of the Green River to supply a city the size of Orem, its proposal will rest entirely in the hands of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

To secure a water right, state law requires a finding that the proposed purpose is economically and physically feasible, is in the public interest, and financing is available. Blue Castle fails on all these points, according to Cooper, a fellow for economic analysis in the Institute for Energy and the Environment at Vermont Law School.

The company has conceded it won’t build the plant, but it intends to assemble a package of approvals and plans to sell to utilities as an "option" to diversify their power source portfolios to include nuclear.

The problem is that no regional utility has shown an interest, which makes the project too speculative to qualify for water rights, according to Cooper.

He contends nuclear power generation has become prohibitively expensive because of its myriad safety concerns and technological complexity.

"The only states where [nuclear reactors] are being built is in states where the risk has been shifted to the ratepayers," Cooper said.


story continues below
story continues below

New reactors have been approved for existing plants in Georgia and South Carolina, states that have "advanced cost recovery," a program in which some costs are covered in rate hikes imposed on those using the nuclear plant’s electricity. Such subsidies are not available in Utah or in neighboring states that would be logical recipients of some of the 3,000 megawatts coming out of the proposed two-reactor plant near Green River.

In his testimony Tuesday and Wednesday, State Engineer Kent Jones, the public official who assigned the water to the project, acknowledged that Blue Castle has raised nowhere near enough money to build the plant, expected to cost $16 billion to $18 billion. Nor have commitments panned out from an investor, later fingered as a fraud by federal regulators, and an unnamed utility, both cited as project backers during the water rights hearing two years ago.

But Jones maintained that the Provo-based company, headed by former Republican lawmaker Aaron Tilton and former NRC chairman Nils Diaz, has a sound business plan for getting a license from the commission.

Nearly all the $17 million Blue Castle has thus far raised came from a Colorado oil and gas pipeline company it acquired in exchange for a stake in the project, according to testimony from company executives. Willow Creek LLC generates about $8 million in annual profit, money that Blue Castle is using to fund its work to secure approvals for the nuclear project, a process expected to cost $100 million and take another five years.

Diaz revealed that his own $53,000 investment in Blue Castle has secured an 8 percent stake in the project.

bmaffly@sltrib.com



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.