Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Matthew Brown | Associated Press file photo In this April 4, 2013 file photo, a mechanized shovel loads coal onto a haul truck at the Cloud Peak Energy's Spring Creek mine near Decker, Mont. Environmentalists in Utah are saying it's better if a proposed min near Alton never got off the ground.
Environmentalists: Bury southern Utah coal project
Public lands » BLM expected to release impact statement on Coal Hollow Mine expansion near Bryce.
First Published Sep 10 2013 05:34 pm • Last Updated Sep 11 2013 12:38 pm

America may need energy, but the country would be better off if federal coal near Alton stayed in the ground, say Utah environmental groups.

"Utah needs another coal mine like we need more bad air," a Sierra Club-led consortium said in a joint statement Tuesday. The proposed expansion of the Coal Hollow Mine would industrialize the lands near Bryce Canyon National Park for the sake of a low-cost dirty fossil fuel that has no place in the nation’s energy future, said Tim Wagner, Sierra Club’s Utah representative, as he delivered a petition bearing 47,000 signatures to the Bureau of Land Management’s Salt Lake City office.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The federal agency is soon expected to release a supplemental environmental impact statement on Alton’s proposal to strip-mine coal on 3,500 acres of public land adjacent to the private land it currently mines.

"If expansion of the mine is permitted, endangered wildlife like the sage grouse will lose precious habitat, dust from operations will cloud the pristine night sky and amazing vistas in the park, and increased truck traffic will snarl roads and overwhelm local towns, putting the local recreation economy, which relies on the world-class recreation opportunities the park currently provides, at risk," states the environmentalists’ letter, addressed to Interior Secretary Sally Jewell and BLM director Neil Kornze.

A phone message left with Alton Coal Development’s general manager Larry Johnson was not returned Tuesday. The company has reported that the expansion would increase its workforce from 31 to 100 and would generate $1.7 billion in economic activity over 25 years.

But emissions from burning coal takes a big toll on public health, costing Utah as much as $2 billion a year, according to Matt Pacenza, policy director of HEAL Utah.

"Coal is only cheap if you ignore its true costs," he said.

In the past Johnson has disputed the Alton expansion, which enjoys the support of Kane and Garfield county leaders, would have any impact on park visitors who flock to the ponderosa-covered rim of Bryce Canyon to take in the views from its scenic red cliffs. The park, he argued, is too far away for light and dust from the 24-hour operation to interfere with this experience.

But the National Park Service concluded otherwise in its comments to BLM. The project would also obliterate the southern-most population of greater sage grouse at the very time it is being considered for listing as a endangered species, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Environmental opposition may be the least of the mine’s problems as markets for Utah coal become increasingly uncertain.

story continues below
story continues below

The mine’s current customer, the Intermountain Power Project near Delta, is under pressure from its major electricity customers in Southern California to switch from coal to natural gas.

The City of Los Angeles, which buys 45 percent of IPP power, intends to end all reliance on coal-fired electricity by 2025 because the fuel emits twice as much carbon dioxide as natural gas. The 23 Utah cities that own the plant are being asked to authorize a conversion. On Aug. 27, the Bountiful city council endorsed the switch.


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.